CHALMERS RYAN SOLICITORS 56 Wedderburn Road Finchley London N12 Tel:12345678912 Fax:01234567891 Ref:w1590155 Boris Peter Fielding 54 Buckingham Way Finchley London N12 OPT Date: 30th June 2016 Dear Mr. Fielding, I am writing to provide you with information in relation to the personal injury claim that you want to bring against Shopping Village Limited Company. First of all, I will repeat the facts in order to make sure of my knowledge of the incident. Then, as you have previously
22 PAPER-4 (LL1008) LAW OF TORT AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS nd st (2 Semester, 1 Year of the 3-Year LLB course) PART A- Law of torts PART B – Consumer Protection Law PART –A General Principles 1. General Principles – Definition, distinction between tort, crime, contract, breach of trust. 2. Essential conditions of liability – Damnum Since injuria, Injuria sine damnum, Malice, Motive. 3. Foundations of tortuous liability, fault liability, strict liability, principles of insurance in torts. 4
Biyani's Think Tank Concept based notes Business Laws (MBA) Lecturer Deptt. of Commerce & Management Biyani Girls College, Jaipur For more details: - http://www.gurukpo.com 2 Published by : Think Tanks Biyani Group of Colleges Concept & Copyright : ©Biyani Shikshan Samiti Sector-3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur-302 023 (Rajasthan) Ph : 0141-2338371, 2338591-95 • Fax : 0141-2338007 E-mail : acad@biyanicolleges.org Website :www.gurukpo.com; www.biyanicolleges.org First Edition
Q.22 What is Champerty? Ans.: It is a bargain where by one party agrees to assist the other in recovering property. Q.23 What is wagering Agreement? Ans.: It is an agreement involving payment of a sum of money upon the determination of an uncertain event. Q.24 What do
DURESS 1. Generally If one party pressures the contractual consent of another by duress the contract is voidable by that other party (See Also s 52A TPA and s 39 FTA). The common law has long recognised that duress, in the form of coercion of the plaintiff’s will through illegitimate pressure or threats to the plaintiff’s interests, render a contract voidable (Barton v Armstrong). Traditionally, the common law concept of duress was limited to actual or threatened violence to the person of