Children Tried As Adults Essay

whether a teen should be convicted as an adult or a child after committing a crime. Depends on how bad the crime is reflects whether a teen should be tried as an adult or not. Many people believe that criminals under 18 should not be tried as adults because they are kids, but when is a kid still a kid? By law people under 18 are still kids but they can make the same decisions as if they were adults. Teens who commit violent crimes should be sentenced as adults because they are old enough to comprehend

do children lose their innocence? It’s a question that has been pondered by many throughout the years. Especially, by criminal psychologists when it comes to whether to try a child as an adult or as a minor. Obviously, this is an argument that involves two sides. The two articles presented had very different views as to whether or not children should be tried as adults or not. The article written by J. Steven Smith “Adult prisons: no place for kids” addresses how children should not be tried as

killed by children. America is listed as a leading nation of assaults and murders (prothrow-Stith). Young criminals strike all age groups. Statistics show that 55 percent of crimes are against someone of adolescent age and are committed by children in the same age group (Sexton). A concealed gun or knife has become a common accessory such as a pocket comb. Many young people are killed for a jacket, a pair of sneakers, a misinterpreted glance, or an iPod. Researchers state that children exhibit innocence

Should children be tried as adults? Children should be tried based on the crime that they committed. If someone underage kills a person, commits grand larceny, homicide, or something worse, than they should be tried as adults. If an under aged person does something that was an accident or a small offence then they shouldn't be tried as adults, this would have to work on a case by case basis. There are several court cases where a child was tried as an adult and it goes against the eighth amendment

juveniles. One side wants children to be never be tried as as adults (no matter the crime). The otherside wants to allow for courts to charge children as adults; with a reasonable excuse to (like murder). Kids who intentionally commit murder, rape, or other major offenses must be tried as an adult and be charged with life without the possibility of parole. It is only fair for the safety and peace of our citizens, to try child offenders who committed a serious crime as adults. With the spike of adolescents

punishments as adults. There are many reasons why children should not be tried as adults. First of all, children should not be able to get a hold of weapons. Also, if children were tried as adults they would be sent to adult facilities which could be very dangerous. When around adults’ children will pick up on their poor behavior. Parents should be held accountable for the child’s crime too. Children should not be able to get a hold of weapons in the first place. (Reaves) If an adult gives a child

Children should not be tried as adults because their brains are not fully developed, they need guidance rather than bad role models, and childrens rehabilitation takes much less time than for an adult. The first support for this aurgument is that a childs prefrontal cortex does not actually stop developing until age 25. This means that before age 25 you are much more prone to errors in judgement and lack of self control. Also the adolescent brain is at a crucial stage of development and therefore

Rodney Hulin was only 16 years old when he was charged with arson and sent to an adult prison for eight years. During his time in prison he spent a year with a clean record but then was transferred to another person without reason or notice to his parents. He was 17 at the time and during his first week in prison he sent his father a letter saying “"Dad, I'm really scared, scared that I will die in here. Please pray for me. Pray that I will get my job changed, sent to a hospital, get out of here

Children under 16 years old, who have committed violent crimes, should not be tried as adults in the United States. Children under 16 should be put in a juvenile court no matter what crime they have committed. The child may know right from wrong, but they shouldn’t be sentenced years in a prison if they are younger than 16. However, they do deserve consequences for their actions, just not as harsh as adult court would make it for the juvenile. The U.S. Government should make a law to keep children

young children make horrible mistakes and are punished for their crimes. Should these young children be considered criminals if they make a mistake? Is it fair to say that when a child makes a mistake, they should get the second chance they deserve? There is no denying that everyone makes mistakes, especially if they are too young to know what is right and what is wrong. Research have shown “as many as 25 percent of all juvenile offenders younger than eighteen are now prosecuted in adult court”