College should

Should college athletics be paid College athletes devote much of their time and energy to their teams, and in return the teams often receive a big-time deal, College athletics spend at least 43.3 hours per week to practice and have a commit to the team. Have you ever wondered why teams are so good, the reason for that is colleges recruit the best players around the country or state so their team overall can be the best all time. So why not pay the athletics if colleges are getting ranked players

College tuition, something that everyone worries about and works tirelessly to save their entire lives for. What would happen if college tuition disappeared and college was suddenly free? In this rhetorical analysis, I will be analyzing two different articles on if college should be free. While both of these articles use logos and politics to prove their statements and force their arguments to be stronger, the first argument explains that college should be free for everyone and the other disagrees

Should Community College be Free? In the article, “As He Promotes It, Some Question Obama’s Free Community College Idea” written by Joanne Jacobs, the author states the different arguments between whether or not Obama’s idea of making community college free is a good idea for both the institutions and for the students planning on attending. This can then lead to colleges not getting any funding because they won’t be getting any money, tuition wise, from the students but rather the government. Although

the payment of college athletes. However, doing so is not a considerable option because college athletes already receive substantial benefits. Paying college athletes would prove to be an economic hardship for all but a few universities. Also, athletes in college who seek payment for playing a sport are able to sign contracts and play in alternative professional leagues. For these reasons, college athletes should absolutely not be paid. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid due to

the college with the most money, could pay the best student-athletes, the most money and Cinderella stories for the most part would disappear. Dynasties of college sports would be made. Money would ruin college sports more than it already has. It has already stripped championships, ruined players images and futures, and tarnished reputations of colleges. The Fab 5, the near “3-Pete” for Oklahoma University, and the USC Trojans football team scandal, are just a few instances where college sports

Due to recent increases in college tuition, there has been a growing debate over the possibility of free college. Many stu- dents do not attend college because they cannot afford it. Even students currently in college are having trouble affording it. Most believe there would be more people attend college for a good career if college was free.The recent studies of tuition increases have proven that it is obvious college should be free. Universities are schools that help someone continue his

College should not be free. I personally don't think that college should be free. Students who pay for their college are more motivated, hard working and independent. Many students would have poor motivation to finish school, because they can always come back. As a matter of fact students with ambitions to get university degree are learning much harder in high school than other, who thinks they don’t need an extra paper. There are many students that are so smart, and they will find the way to

paying college athletes. In courtrooms across the United States, a resolution—and a possible revolution—is beginning to gain traction. Some people believe that a scholarship is payment enough, whereas others believe the athletes are being exploited to generate millions of dollars toward the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Although student athletes and universities should agree on a term for scholarships, paying athletes additional money would undermine the value a college education

sports gaining popularity, the growth of college sports went on the rise. In 2013, The National Collegiate Athletic Association statistically generated $912,804,046 (Alesia, 2014). With all of this income that the NCAA brought in, one has to raise the question, should college athletes be paid? Even though college athletes are student athletes, they should be paid because they are practically employees to the college without compensation. But why should a student athlete be paid in the first place

The majority of people in America that go to college are involved in sports. Everyone who plays a college sport plays without pay. Colleges should pay for play. College players work just as hard as the professionals and don 't get paid any money. College players work hard, put their bodies on the line, and have to balance sports and school together. Colleges offer many options for sports. Most colleges offer “baseball, basketball, crew, cross-country, fencing, field hockey, football, golf, ice hockey