Conservative Party of Canada

sphere while others start to fade away. Canada is a country that only becomes more relevant as time goes on. Since being granted full sovereignty, Canada has had a growing role as a major world player. Much of their international growth has to do with its close ties to the United States and the United Kingdom. However, the country has also undergone huge change and refocusing on a domestic level. With influence from both Europe and the United States, Canada has a very unique system of governing. This

(Syrian refugee crisis and his policy on the Niqab), he appeared to have made some politically incorrect choices, which therefore ended the Conservative government’s ruling of Canada. Had the Canadian government employed Proportional Representation instead of the First Past The Post system, then the Conservatives would have still had more in the current affairs of Canada, except for simply being the opposition. By carrying out various research, it has become apparent that the structure of the Canadian parliamentary

The two Federal political parties that I chose to compare and contrast is Thomas Muclair and Stephen Harper. Thomas Muclair is the NDP. Thomas Muclair is French and tom is English. (Joanna Smith, 2015).I prefer to call Thomas because it sounds better than tom. NDP stands for New Democratic Party. Stephen Harper is the Conservative party. The political party that I agree with is NDP and the political party that I disagree with is Conservative. The reason why I agree with Thomas Muclair is that

campaign spending legislation were all potentially beneficial to Harper and the Conservative Party, but his underestimation of strategic voting and the power of social media, combined with his use of polarising debates and the decision of many popular incumbent Tory MP’s not to run, led to his party’s downfall and the creation of a Liberal majority government. This essay delves deeper into the factors behind the Conservative Party’s loss in the October 2015 Canadian election, in an attempt to understand

Introduction: Canadian politics has always been defined by the federal government’s interactions with the various regions and provinces within Canada. Over time, Canadian politics has evolved to be focused on three individual issues: the federal government’s attempt to keep Quebec within the federation, the economic, political, and cultural dominance of Ontario, and, from a Western Canadian point of view, the subordination of the West. The popularity of the latter notion has become increasingly

of both minority and majority government (for example efficiency, compromise, and power) and argue that in fact neither offers a fair representation of Canadian’s due to lack of both transparency and accountability. Parliamentary Government In Canada there are three branches of government: the executive branch which enforces Canadian laws and carries out government business; the legislative branch which debates and passes laws; and the judicial branch which interprets the laws and dictates how

Canadian foreign policy in the restructuring of military intervention in foreign affairs and the pro-trade globalization mandates of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Trudeau’s election defines the overriding political agenda of the Liberal Party of Canada to stop ineffective bombing missions in Syria and Iraq, yet to maintain special forces troops to better manage the war against ISIS. More so, Trudeau supports the globalization of Canadian trade by promoting the positive effects of the TPP to

campaigns largest attractions Harper representing the fiscal conservatives and Trudeau representing the big deficit spending policies of the Liberals, with largely different economic views that would

terms of the reform option, as a country, we absolutely cannot afford to abolish the Senate, as it serves as, and is meant to be, a body of un-biased “economic and social élite”, who are capable of making/approving decisions to benefit the citizens of Canada, rather than the House of Commons, which makes decisions by majority, and in their own interest. The Senate is meant to play a neutral role, to be the final judge to make the un-biased, informed decisions. Sometimes, the Senate has taken on other

the lack of funds possessed by the Conservative government. The conclusion can be drawn that, had Macdonald had the resources available to further campaign, he would not have felt the need to make questionable dealings with wealthy individuals. Additionally, other factors that had a significant impact on both scandals were greed and selfishness. These are often seen in any scandal, but were severe enough in these two instances to drive Macdonald’s Conservatives and Chrétien’s Liberals out of office