Damage

Torts Problem Assignment IntroductionThrough a physical incident arising during a professional soccer match, Marc sustained loss and damage through his knee injury to which an action of battery may lie against David. BatteryBattery is a direct action in trespass which is either intentional or negligent, and is actionable per se without proof of damage. A direct act is evident through the physical contact between David and Marc. Intention may be present even where the defendant acts impulsively

TO: Olo Dictum and Areta Obiter, Senior partners FROM: Kate Thompson RE: Damage from Contamination This opinion assesses Fancy Fertiliser’s liability under the rule in Ryland’s and Fletcher. Was the hydrofluorosilicic acid likely to cause mischief? The rule established in Ryland’s and fletcher is that anything likely to cause mischief, if it escapes refers to “beasts, or water, or filth, or stenches.” In the case of Cambridge Water Co and Eastern Counties Leather, the chemical perchloroethene (for

permits the recovery of damages upon destruction or reduction of prospects to ultimately achieve a more favorable outcome. In the case of Rufo v Hosking, the court found that – “In order to recover damages for the loss of a chance of a better outcome, the plaintiff is required to

to: Dr. Phillip Udo-inyang In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course: CEE3311- Construction Engineering Done By: Imad Barrouh Due Date: 10/20/2015   Case #1: The nonreinforcement of liquidated damages Case #: 2014-Ohio-2377, 13CA836- appeal. Title: – liquidated damages were held unenforceable. Parties involved: • Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. •

The Operations Team is led by the Senior Operator. All operations staff are members. The team members and responsibilities overlap with the Systems and Applications Software Team. Computer members of the Damage Assessment Team are to join the Operations Team as damage assessment winds down (usually within 48 hours). The Team is responsible for: • establishing emergency production procedures at the secondary site, • operating the secondary site if required, • recreate as closely as

follows: STATEMENT OF FACTS I. The Underlying Occurrence. Plaintiff, Toni Arnold (“Arnold”) contends—in total—that: On or about June 25, 2016, the Plaintiff’s automobile, a 2006 Lincoln LS, was stolen from her and burned to the point where the property damage to the automobile was determined to be a total loss. At the time, the Plaintiff was covered by an automobile insurance police with the

gasoline in the river ignited and caught on fire. The fire burnt along the river for one and a half miles. As a result of the gasoline catching on fire, three people were killed with another eight people injured. It has been estimated that total damages to property reach as high as 45 million dollars. This pipeline explosion was a horrible disaster that could have been avoided for a variety of reasons. There are multiple important people and organizations involved with this gasoline pipeline explosion

Breach of Contract Jane has decided to buy a dinner service. A neighbour tells her that a sister-in-law, Carolyn, is planning to sell her valuable Coalport service. Jane telephones Carolyn who tells her that the Coalport is a full service, in immaculate condition and completely original. Jane inquires whether the Coalport is in 'athlone blue', knowing that this is particularly valuable. Carolyn replies, "It must be, it's the proper Coalport blue colour". Jane further

Stella Liebeck, 81, who suffered thirddegree burns in the 1992 incident, contended that McDonald 's coffee was too hot. A state district court jury imposed $2.7 million in punitive damages and $160,000 in compensatory damages Wednesday. Ken Wagner, one of Liebeck 's attorneys, said that he had asked the jury for punitive damages equal to two days ' worth of McDonald 's coffee sales, which he estimated at $1.34

Question 1 Peng & Lau, a firm of accountants, recently purchased a laptop computer from computer retailer Ace Computers Ltd for $5,000. The laptop was acquired for use by the auditing staff of Peng & Lau during the times when they are working at the premises of clients of the firm. A term of the contract between Peng & Lau and Ace Computers provides that the liability of Ace Computers in relation to any defective computer is restricted to the cost of repairing the relevant defect(s). Soon after the