Deconstruction

Deconstruction, according to Dictionary.com, is a philosophical and critical movement, that questions all traditional assumptions about the ability of language to represent reality. "A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner incites its readers to look for the deeper meaning behind every temporal shift, symbol, and conflict in order to truly understand the author's view about a certain reality. The story begins with Emily's funeral and from there on, the reader goes back in time to her life until

A Deconstruction of Erich Maria Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front The young soldiers depicted in Erich Maria Remarque's text All Quiet on the Western Front represent a generation without precedent, constancy, or forethought. The men, answering their elders' calls to become national heroes, have lost their innocence on the battlefield and remain forever altered in belief and spirit. Remarque contrasts the cold realities of war in the present to the tranquility of the past in order to

A poststructuralist analysis, after Jacques Derrida and Paul De Man, would attempt to negate the idea of concept within language. The separation of the content plane and the expression plane cannot be achieved, thus literature demystifies itself and is demystified from the start. Concept does not exist in the form of language; once concept has taken the form of language it is already the second thought, has already been re-parsed and re-processed, and literature in particular is subject to a continual

Applying Deconstructive Criticism in Beauty and the Beast The sweet, unselfish and loving daughter named Belle can be turned into someone who we never thought when we’re young that she can be. According to Derrida (1960’s) Deconstruction is a method of reading which is based on the assumption that language is unreliable. The goal of a deconstructionist reading is to seek out the contradictions in the text to prove that the text lacks unity and coherence. So in the story of Beauty and the Beast

After a countless amount of readings of Ernest Hemingway’s short story “A Clean, Well-Lighted Place” I have often contemplated what it all means. I’ve previously been told by my undergraduate professor that the story has no intrinsic meaning or value. I refuse to believe that is true. All stories can have multiple meanings that are buried deep beneath the text. It just requires an extensive analyzation of the short story. Why would the story be written if it had no meaning? In this paper, I will

Another difference of opinion could be that Tessie reveals a great deal of inequality within this scene, that this scene reveals a great amount of gender inequality in society. For example, the lottery reinforces gender oppression as it is men such as Mr. Summer, who operates the lottery. Tessie is the one who dies because of the lottery yet has little agency over in the community 's affairs. Furthermore, since it is Bill who pulls the slip of paper from the box, the narrative is reinforcing the

‘Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences' (Derrida, 1978: 278 –293) may be read as the document of an event, although Derrida actually commences the essay with a reservation regarding the word "event", as it entails a meaning "which it is precisely the function of structural – or structuralist – thought to reduce or suspect" (278). This, I infer, refers to the emphasis within structuralist discourse on the synchronous analysis of systems and relations within them, as opposed

yet for postmodernism, the rejection mostly dealt with homogeneity (a conformed universal standard defined by advancements in American quality of life) and how literature deconstructs the ideas of homogeneity (Byam 2259-2260). Yet many of these deconstructions during this era ended up clashing due to increased influences of psychological and sociological advancements, which gave better understanding of human nature; which then lead to a major schism between literary writers and critics. As a result

call it, an ontology that does take into account the presence of the ghosts and specters. In my opinion, this deconstruction of the dichotomy between what exists and what does not exist, is necessary but not enough. In her book Frames of War, Butler differentiates what it is to apprehend a life and what is to recognize a life as a life. In my opinion, if we stop after the deconstruction of the dichotomy of ontology between what exists and what does not exist, we would be only apprehending the fact

in structuralist theory, the work easily lends itself to a multiplicity of meanings, an inherent feature of deconstruction work that allows readers to veer into feminist theory, queer theory, or even Marxist theory. Just as Bechdel rewrites and reframes the events of her formative years multiple times throughout the novel, the novel particularly lends itself to structuralist, deconstruction, queer, and feminist theory, which all lead to particularly illuminating readings that compliment each other