Electoral college system

The Electoral College: A College We Can All Get Behind After every American presidential election, some citizens are upset with the results, but nothing has been seen quite like the 2016 election. On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton via the Electoral College, 306 votes to 232 votes (“2016 Election Results”). Clinton, however, won the national popular vote by almost three million votes, leaving many Americans outraged. Outgoing Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) even attempted to

With the Electoral College system for electing the United States president winning the most popular votes is not a guarantee a candidate will become president. They must also get 270 Electoral College votes to win. A candidate can become president if he gets at least 270 Electoral College votes and does not have the most popular votes. Many people do not like the Electoral college system for this reason. They feel the person with the most popular votes should win. Unfortunately for them, the

to our nations. To understand and appreciate how electing begain we would have to go back in the late 1700s were the founding fathers created the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president. The design of the electoral college was that each State was allocated a number of Electors equal to the number of its U.S. Senators (always 2) plus the number of its U.S. Representative

trust its citizens, the founding fathers established in the Constitution the Electoral College as a compromise between the election of the president by a popular vote and by a vote in Congress. Until now, citizens cannot vote directly for their president that breaks democratic principles and obscures presidential politics. But, are these arguments enough to prove that the winner-take-all principle of the Electoral College be abolished even if is has proved that is has worked well in this century having

The electoral college is a relic from days gone by, and like those days, it’s time for it to retire. The college, in all it’s promotes the blatant distrust of the will of the majority, has a sub-par backup plan in the event of an electoral tie, and violates political equality. The Electoral College's plan in the event of an electoral tie is an inherently flawed one, and instead of simpler alternatives such as simply using the direct vote, it goes to the House of Representatives. The problem with

The Electoral College: Ingenious or Inept? The 2016 presidential election left many voters feeling bitter and hostile. President-elect Donald Trump is a minority president, meaning that he won the electoral vote yet lost the popular vote (“2016 Election Results”). There have only been four minority presidents preceding Trump: John Quincy Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, Benjamin Harrison, and George W. Bush (Stepman). However, recently some voters and politicians began calling for eliminating the electoral

The Outdated Electoral College Needs to Go In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by over two million votes, yet, still lost the election. The electoral college is an outdated system the United States uses in the presidential elections and it is a system that is fundamentally not representing each citizen equally. Thus, it allows a candidate to win the Presidency without the support of a majority of voters. The electoral college is outdated and it is time to implement

The Electoral College has been around since 1787 and is how the United States elects the president and vice president. Many people support the Electoral College because the Founding Fathers thought it was the only way to have a democracy without completely trusting the people to elect the president. The Electoral College process is stated in the Constitution so many people think it is the only way to elect the president. Many critics of the Electoral College call it out on the fact that a candidate

country in the world that does not allow the people to directly elect their President. Instead, the United States opts for the undemocratic institution of the Electoral College, in which electors from each state are chosen and these electors are the actual people that cast the votes that decide the presidential election. The Founders set up a system in Article II Section I of the Constitution that guarantees, “each state shall appoint… a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives

Electoral College Pros and Cons The 2016 presidential election was an example of the discrepancy between the Electoral College votes and the national popular votes. If the last presidential election had been decided by a national popular vote, then Hillary Clinton would have won the presidency because she had the majority of votes. However, due to the design of the Electoral College, Donald Trump won the election for president in 2016; although, he lost the national popular vote. Just as some people