Empirical formula

In education, gamification has shown some encouraging results, since some of the research done have report improvement in student engagement in forums, projects, and other learning activities (Anderson et al. 2014; Caton and Greenhill 2013; Akpolat and Slany 2014). Additionally, some studies have shown increase in attendance, participation, and material downloads (Barata et al. 2013; Goehle 2013). Dicheva et al (2015) presented a literature review of the state of gamification research in education

How Subliminal Messaging Affects Consumer Behavior The subject of subliminal messaging in relation to consumer behavior presents an interesting dichotomy between the scientific community and the general public. The purpose of this paper is to discover what, if any, effect subliminal messaging has on consumer behavior, as well as shed light on the differing positions regarding this controversial subject, and provide a brief historical background on the material. Before the topic of subliminal

Concepts and Applications January 17, 2012 Evaluating a Website for Credibility In order to search for the reputable scholarly website one must remember two basic principles: not every website has scholarly related data and not all the data has empirical foundation. The first intention of going to www.google.com will leave one with 1000’s of non-specific results. "Google Scholar" website (http://scholar.google.com), on the other hand will be more relative but not very specific. During previous

Various universities and individual faculty members frequently differ in terms of attendance policy. The frequent absence of explicit university wide policy enables instructors to implement a wide range of attendance requirements and subsequent penalties for absences. Even professors with a lax attendance policy encourage regular class attendance, deeming it a critical element of student success. The classroom has traditionally played a central role in educational institutions. Relentless innovation

steps of decision making. Typically this case serves to be at a micro level, however with the inclusion of media and personals that do not belong as the primary characters, this case also looks at macro level theories. Along with that I explored the empirical and normative approaches as well different perspectives of individuals based on ethics, morals and practicality. The central focus of this case is the relationship between Jack and Freddy however there are other issues that I considered to derive

Efficient Market Hypothesis and the Effect of High Frequency Trading The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) has consistently remained in the forefront of finance theory for decades. As technology has advanced, the ability to assess the efficient market hypothesis has increased exponentially and so have the opportunities to exploit it. Tactics such as high frequency trading and insider trading threaten the dependability of the efficient market hypothesis. EMH is a rudimentary theory that implies

collecting numbers and entering them into your computer data base. The earlier you organize your data into data tables, the better. Creating results      Once you have reviewed the relevant literature and collected the data you need for any empirical work you plan to do, you are ready to get down to the central task of research: creating results. The way that you achieve these results depends entirely on the research methodology you and your advisor have chosen. It may involve theoretical reasoning

fairly accurate when it is based on one participant” (Landrum, 2012 par. 1). Research suggests that there is a growing strain toward towards clinicians that requires them to apply psychological approaches and techniques that are supported by empirical data

It majorly depends on quantifiable observations which lead to statistical analysis of the data. It has been noted positivism is in accordance with the empirical view that knowledge stems from human experience.

The way the conclusion was written is unbiased for it was clearly presented and stated. The terms are evidently defined as well and so, no further revision of the conclusion is needed. 2. Next, re-examine the claim of the conclusion: If it is an empirical generalization, then challenge it by demanding the required evidence for many, most or all claim in the premises set. If the required evidence for the generalization was not offered in the premise set, then reject the argument for having committed