Equity Essay

Parkview Queensland Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2013] NSWCA 422 FACTS The appellant, Parkview Queensland Pty Ltd (“Parkview”), is a building contractor who commenced construction of a residential property development under a standard form building contract with Fortia funds Management Ltd (“Fortia”), the developer. Fortia financed the construction under a loan facility with the Bank of Western Australia Ltd (“BankWest”). The building contract provided for progressive payments to

MLC707 Commercial and Corporations Law Trimester 3, 2014 Feedback Research Assignment (15%) Points to note:  Students have been shown in class on how to solve a law problem assignment – ie, essay or report format is expected, with clear introduction outlining the legal issues to be discussed at the onset, followed by clear statements of relevant principles and demonstration of how those legal principles are applicable to the given facts.  Some students will merely refer to the principles in Amadio

Objective National Bank of Canada ("NBC" or "the Bank") is tasked with the decision to review Dawson Lumber Company Limited's ("Dawson") request for an increase in its line of credit up to the amount of $10.8mm. Dawson intends to finance inventory and receivables with the line of credit. NBC must remain cognizant of the competitive landscape of the lumber industry and assess whether a focus on the retail segment is beneficial to Dawson's strategic plan. Given that Dawson is one of the region's

B. Interview format: In an attempt to better understand the barriers in getting perpetrators to surrender their guns, and the possible solution in remedying them, I conducted interviews with different members of the King County community. The goal of these interviews was to generate information regarding the experiences of DV victims, and their advocates as well as law enforcement agencies on the issue of gun surrendering. Interviews were done primarily in person with the attorneys, and primarily

The personal liability of third parties for having received or dealt with trust rights or their traceable substitutes which they received in breach of trust is known as recipient liability. Knowing receipt arises where the recipient has some degree of knowledge that the property was received in breach of the trust or following receipt acquired some degree of knowledge that the rights were trust rights and dealth with them as his/her own instead of returning them to the trust. In Re Montagu’s Settlement

Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher (2003) 212 CLR 484 Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ MATERIAL FACTS: The appellant company (Youyang) was trustee of a discretionary trust formed in 1974 for the Hayward family. Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher’s (Minters) had been acting for EC Consolidated Capital Limited (ECCCL) since July 1991, all work in connection with the drafting of the documents relating to the subscription for preference shares in ECCCL was dealt with by Minters

Secret trusts arise where a testator explains to X that they want property to be held on trust for Y and then leaves the property to X in their Will. It is also possible that a secret trust arises where in reliance on a promise to implement the trust by X, no Will is made (Strickland v Aldridge 1804 9 Ves 516 REF1). The onus of proving a secret trust is on the person claiming that it exists, on the balance of probabilities - the 'ordinary civil standard of proof' (Re Snowden 1979 3 All ER 172 REF2)

The first being that compensation was to be calculated on the basis of “determining the gross amounts charged by [the employee company, in breach] in the invoices it sent to the wrongly diverted customers and applying to those figures the profit margins that [the plaintiff company] would have realised had it carried out the work, less tax.” Alternatively, Digital was entitled to elect an account of profits against the three defendants jointly and severally. Those profits were to be calculated

RELIANCE LAWYERS TO: Client FROM: Christine Bulos SUBJECT: Sandy V Mark DATE: 17th April 2017 CC: Partners@reliancelawyers.com.au PURPOSE: This memorandum analyses the contractual dealings between our client, Sandy, and Mark to determine whether equitable and proprietary estoppel is applicable in this case, and whether the promise Mark made to Sandy in regards to subdividing his land must be upheld. SUMMARY: QUESTION 1A) It will be argued that estoppel is definitely applicable in this case

Folchi 9/26/17 English B Essay Boot Camp Equity vs. Equality How far should the society go when treating someone with equality and equity? Equality and equity should be displayed only to the extent that it is right in God’s eyes. When both equity and equality come together in a Godly way all people from all societies will benefit successfully through equity, be equal with genders and races, and the outcomes will help some or all of the society. Equity can come with success because in society people