Executive Yuan

Introduction: The United States’ can trace its famous two party system back to the federalist and Antifederalist parties. Although ideas from each side often clash, our government has key features that trace back to this great debate. Separation of powers, federalism, and even the Bill of Rights are rooted in compromise between Federalist and Antifederalist ideas. Arguably the most important of these is the principle of separation of powers. This principle is observed in the three branches of the

In INS v. Chadha, the issue at hand was a House action that was not sent to the Senate or the President for approval but was made and approved solely in the House. The House had decided to pass a resolution, a legislative veto, that would have overturned the Attorney General’s decision to allow Chadha to stay in the country. The Supreme Court decided legislative vetoes were unconstitutional. In Justice Burger’s opinion, he focused on a few key points these being the Presentment Clause, bicameralism

Sophocles’ greek tragedy, Antigone, follows Antigone as she is punished for burying her brother, Polyneices. For her actions, Antigone receives imprisonment as retribution directly from King Creon, as he is the government of Thebes. Through the use of rhetoric and logical fallacies, Sophocles shows the faults of Creon’s power and Thebian monarchy, and hints at the more effective system of Athenian Democracy. Through a comparison between the monarchy of Antigone to the democracy of the United States

position of power this current era. It's astonishing how a position of power can drastically change over time. Overall, Hamilton believed the judicial system is the weakest branch of the government. He believed their position is overpowered by the executive and the legislative branch. Today the dialog of discussion would be on his insight on the government system in his era and I’ll also be providing a theory on how he would feel about today’s judicial branch of government in the 21st-century.

was no chief executive and no court system. Tyranny is “The accumulation of all powers...in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many (is) the very definition of tyranny” by James Madison. The constitution guards against tyranny by federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the large and small states both treated equally. Federalism is two powerful parts of government, central and state government. The two powers let both governments authorized to carry

exact phenomenon. The creation of an independent executive will allow the President to craft his own policies, but also allows for other bodies of government to counter any actions that are out of hand. Should the executive come from an elected body, such as the Senate, then the executive will be beholden exclusively to their wishes, not those of the people. The independence of the president allows some freedom to act and ensures that the executive will not simply be a servant of a small elite body

Separations of powers is a principle of the United States government, giving powers and responsibilities that are divided among the legislative branch, executive branch, and judicial branch. Checks and balances are certain powers that each branch of our federal government have to check on each other and make sure one branch isn’t doing something against the Constitution. These balances between the branches ensure that no branch becomes too powerful. Preventing this means that all of the branches

separation of powers was to protect the United States from tyranny. By dividing the government into the three branches, the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, the Founding Fathers ensured that no one branch would be able to gain full control of the nation (Magleby 2015). In The Federalist, No. 47 James Madison said, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may

Outlined in the American Constitution is the position that the Supreme Court takes within the federal judicial system. Article III clearly states this position: [Section 1]: “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” However, its role as an institution is under constant scrutiny. It was established by the Founding Fathers to be a judicial institution which was totally ‘independent

List- both the central and state government together can take decisions. But the supreme authority goes to the central government CENTRE-STATE RELATIONS The constitution of India being Federal in structure divides all powers (legislative, executive and financial) between Centre and the States. Though the Centre and States are supreme in their respective fields, maximum harmony and coordination between them is essential for the effective operation of the Federal system. Centre-state relations