Existence of God

This paper will examine the argument put forward by William Paley in 1802, in his Natural Theology. Paley offers an argument from design that purports to show a clear and distinct reason why one should hold a belief in God, due to the inherent features of the world. It is attempted in this paper to firstly: show that the argument should be rejected on the grounds of lacking a rationally flowing set of premises and conclusions; and secondly: that the criticisms made by David Hume concerning the

of motion and universal gravitation, many people regard Newton’s findings as an attribution to God for creating the world as a perfect machine.

question. The second term is first cause, which refers to something that causes other things to exist but was not caused to exist itself (an uncaused cause). In this paper, I will argue that Aquinas’ “second way” is an unsound argument for the existence of God. In Aquinas’ argument, he first states that everything has an efficient cause and that nothing can be the efficient cause of itself. If something

I am going to start off by saying I do not believe nor deny the existence of God, or any Gods at that. I am agnostic – someone who does not have faith or disbelief in God; a fact-based way of thinking. I am agnostic because I believe in physical evidence and facts. I do not deny that there is a higher being, but I cannot say I believe in it either. To boil it down to the main reason, there is just not enough evidence to prove it one way or another. In elementary school, my Sundays always began

Against the Existence of God”. If one of these objections hold true it would contradict his conclusion by dismissing one of his premises. The first objection he discusses is the possibility of two omnipotent gods coexisting. Richard Swinburne argued that two all-powerful gods existing together is impossible because the first omnipotent god would be more powerful than the second and the second omnipotent god would be more powerful than the first god. Dr. Mark Walker responds by discussing, if God created

Does God Exist? A Philosophical Argument for the Existence of God Does God Exist? If God so desired, He could merely appear and attest to the whole of humankind that He exists. But if He did that, there would be no need for faith. “Then Jesus told him, 'Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed '” (John 20:29). I’m sure an abundance of people would love for someone to simply show them the evidence for God 's existence. Enough of those

Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already believe in the existence of God than to an atheist. The argument is

for the existence of God. In an effort to gain a deeper knowledge and acquaintance with his creator, Anselm set out to logically deduce God’s existence from the very definition of God. In the Proslogion he writes, “God is that which a greater cannot be thought. Whoever understands this properly, understands that this being exists in such a way that he cannot, even in thought, fail to exist” (Anselm, 101). Anselm uses this definition as the fundamental argument for his proof of God’s existence. He argues

Aquinas and Descartes both have arguments for the existence of God, with some similarities and a multitude of differences. Descartes presents two major premises in his argument with his degrees of reality principle and his casual adequacy principle. It is possible for Descartes to be influenced by Aquinas, but the arguments for the same thing differ greatly that even if any inspiration Descartes could have pulled from Aquinas' work is minimal, to say the least. Comparing Aquinas and Descartes they

Does God Exist? The concept of god is ambiguous and every person has a different take on it. “Does God Exist” is a huge question philosophers reason about and God’s existence has been an ongoing debate for centuries in the philosophical world. There are many arguments that take a stand on the existence of God but no claim can be proven one-hundred percent true. When it come to philosophers their arguments on whether God exist, usually are composed from either the epistemology or ontology branch