Feminization of poverty

Poverty has increasingly become a noticeable issue worldwide over the past couple of decades. With the middle class steadily decreasing, considerable amounts of people are becoming part of the lower class, and even more of our world’s population are beginning to live in poverty. It is important to understand there are different definitions of poverty, and that is largely determined by what each country’s government determines as the cut off of poverty, otherwise known as the ‘poverty line’. Although

Feminization of Poverty Poverty is an issue that is faced by multitudes of people around the world. Poverty itself is defined as, “the state of being poor” (Merriam Webster). According to Sara S. McLanahan, of Princeton University, “In the United States, poverty is defined as not having enough income to pay for basic needs, such as food, clothing and shelter. Poverty is a family attribute. In other words, if a family is classified as poor, all the members of that family are also poor” (McLanahan

Gandhi. In Canada poverty is considered as a relative term. (Young, J. 1990).It basically means that people are not able to enjoy a certain minimum level of living standards as determined by a government. Poverty is a complex societal issue. Diana Pearce, the director of the Centre for Women’s Welfare, coined the term “feminization of poverty” in 1978.The the term “feminization of poverty” is based on gender. It is the phenomenon in which women experience poverty at rates that are disproportionately

The feminization of poverty was coined to capture the increasing rates of poverty among both old and young female headed households. It is attributed to woman who are single parent families with little support from the father and a dependency on jobs with lower wages (Crapo, 2013). Women are more vulnerable to living in poverty primarily due to the gender role expectations placed on them in society. Most girls are socialized from an early age in their culture to put the obligations of family and

Healthcare and the Feminization of Poverty: What examples have you observed The meaning of disparities is often linked to racial or ethnic disparities, although there are many others disparities to consider in today’s society. These disparities such as income, education, transportation, housing all have influenced the meaning of disparities. Minorities groups such as African American, Hispanics, Indians/Alaska Natives, and low-income groups are more likely to be uninsured, whereas Whites with a higher

Introduction The term “feminization of poverty” was first created in 1978 in an article that analyzed the economic statuses of women. “In 1976, nearly two out of three of poor persons over 16 years of age were women” (Pearce; 1976). The feminization of poverty describes a phenomenon in which women represent a disproportionate percentage of the United States poor. This trend is not only a result of lack of income, but also a lack of opportunities due to gender biases and fixed gender roles in some

The “feminization of poverty”, refers to the trend whereby women and children comprise an increasing percentage of the overall poverty population (Pearce, 1978). Virtually unanimous among activists, women are more likely to fall into poverty than their male counterparts. In addition to this assumption regarding the gender-gap, race and ethnicity interact to further shape the gap. The current situation, as it pertains to females, is not only a consequence relatable to lack of income, but also is a

The feminization of poverty is a phenomenon that stems from the gender biases and fixated gender roles embedded in society. This occurrence is defined as the disproportionality in gender when relating to the world's impoverished. Given that under capitalism class, race and sex issues are augmented the global expansion of such an economic system should, in theory, result in an exacerbation of related issues. Thus, it is critical to analyze the impact of an expanding capitalist structure on the lived

is something various scholars, including Hawkesworth, might refer to as the “feminization of globalization” which is tied to some other systemic gendered processes. According to Hawkesworth, not do women make up 70 percent of the poor globally, but the poor are actually constructed as a feminized category, in how they are regarded as “dependent, subrational, and in need of direction” (23). This “feminization of poverty” (Hawkesworth, 23) means that the large group of people in the world who are both

Roll’s article: Women, Poverty, and Trauma: An Empowerment Practice Approach illustrates the benefits of applying empowerment theory in Social Work practice when working with women who’ve experienced poverty and trauma. Through their 20 years of experience in utilizing this approach, they learn that its effects have been rewarding and successful. The following paper is an analysis and critique of this intervention. The article focuses on the “feminization of poverty”, in which women are disproportionally