Food court

A motion for summary judgement is only appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact. Rule 56(c)(3), Ala. R. Civ. P. In doing this, courts test the “sufficiency” of the evidence “to determine if any real [factual] issue exists.” Garrigan v. Hinton Beef & Provision Co., 425 So.2d 1091, 1093 (Ala.1983). The moving party bears the burden of showing that no material issue of fact exists and summary judgement is appropriate. Chiniche v. Smith, 374 So.2d 872 (Ala.1979). The burden of proof

own past experience in the judgment recovery industry. This manual only contains my own personal tips and proven methods based on years of experience as a judgment recovery specialist. While this material is designed to assist you in the recovery of court awarded judgments, we do not present this material as legal advise.

discriminated on the account of his gender and nationality. The primary stipulation to this case was that Nino had signed a contract that was unconscionable. The primary function of this agreement gave most of the power to The Jewelry Exchange. The Court of Appeals decided that the arbitration agreements did not favor their employee. The definition of unconscionable from Webster’s Dictionary states, “excessive, unreasonable”. What is means for a contract to be unconscionable is that contractually

the main objectives of courts and the sentences they impose is that of rehabilitation. This is evidenced through a growing move in favour of a more holistic approach to justice, trying to address the issues which may have led to the crime, rather than just punishing the end result. One of the prime examples of this therapeutic approach to justice is the introduction of the Drug Court. Governed by the Drug Court Act 1998, the Drug court has both Local court and District court jurisdiction, and seeks

the arguments for and against alternative dispute resolution in civil justice SUBMITTED BY: 38715 Md. Akram Uddin 090323580 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Problem with court hearings: * Time and money; * The adversarial process; * Inflexible; * Technical cases; * Publicity; 3. ADR mechanisms: * Arbitration; * Mediation; * Conciliation; * Med-Arb; * Ombudsman ; 4. Advantage of ADR :

decree by a competent court conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit, thus creating substantive rights in favour of the decree-holder. However, lately it has been seen that instead of following the terms and conditions of the decree, judgment-debtors have been placing a number of obstacles in the way of a decree-holder. In fact, such a trend has become so prevalent that it has forced the Supreme Court to opine that ‘the difficulties

College Dictionary Fourth Edition says: "Due Process is the course of legal proceedings established by the legal system of a nation or state to protect individual rights and liberties." Due Process will allow an accused person time to go through the court proceeding, in hope of proving his or her innocence or guilt. Due Process will give the individuals who have been accused of a crime the right to a fair and public trial, the right to be at the trial, the rith to an impartial jury, and the

Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually innocent or guilty, but he persists to ask questions and

On Thursday November 17th, 2005 we attempted to go and see a trial at the Oakland County Circuit Court. An attorney friend advised us to go to the Macomb Circuit Court that Thursday, but due to a scheduling conflict we chose to go the Oakland County Court. We were also advised to go around 1:00 p.m. because the court would commence again after lunch. We arrived to the court at 12:45 and after passing through security we quickly went to the fifth floor courtrooms to find

Stand Trial The Supreme Court has long considered competency to be a right of the criminal defendant in court. In many areas, insanity has been a criminal defense with a significant history. However, in the early part of this century, adult protections, including the competency requirement and common defenses like insanity, were not added into the juvenile court system. Because juvenile courts were established to protect juveniles from the rigors of adult court and punishments in adult facilities