Food court

For my court observation I visited the Frank A. Sedita City Court, which is a court of limited jurisdiction (320-321). The cases were on April 7th at 2 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. with Judge Betty Calvo-Torres. The court was a very crowed and defense attorneys congregated in the front section trying to discuss their cases with the prosecution. When the court proceedings began it became silent as the Judge came in and sat down, but went back to being as loud a few minutes later. The noise continued, at this

If I could change my town or parish, I would have zero tolerance for corruption and insist that the judicial and legal system adhere to a strict policy of honesty and integrity. I see too many circumstances handled in some of the most corrupt methods. One example is that people are suing elderly people over property disputes. The matter goes through the judicial system and the judges do not even follow the laws as they are written. The judges and attorneys have the good-ole-boy sideline agreements

Introduction The law to recklessness has developed and changed over a very long time and for much of this time the two types of recklessness have been Cunningham Recklessness and Caldwell recklessness , however this has recently changed. In this essay I am going to talk about the history of recklessness, how the case of R v G and another 2003 has affected it and the proposals for reform which were considered as a result of the case. The History on the Law on Recklessness The law on recklessness

Court Observation October 30, 2012 On September 27th I went to Branch 6 to watch the criminal trial of the defendant Lord Wilson. It was making out to be a weeklong trial and I made it on the second to last day. All I knew was that it was a case involving drugs and had been in the making for a while. When I arrived at the public safety building to listen to the criminal trial taking place I learned firsthand that things never seem to stay on schedule. A recess was taking place when I walked

The High Court’s Decision and the case of Correctness. That being said, the correctness of this decision by the high court in re-characterising the role of presumptions doesn’t come without its scrutiny. It is often argued that it was wrongful, confusing or downright unnecessary to address presumptions as the case of Ermogenous did. Despite its short falls, the re-characterised role which doesn’t completely rule out presumptions but negates sole reliance on them, provides more positive arguments

I observed court operations at the Plantation Key Government Center in Tavernier, Florida twice: on October 7th and November 4th. I observed Chief Circuit Judge Carlos Garcia in courtroom A. The courthouse is located in the 16th Judicial Circuit of Florida and it’s a state trial court with general jurisdiction. The first visit was cut short, in part because it was a lighter criminal day than planned, but also I was flabbergasted by the lack of professionalism that was present in this courtroom. I’m

“why does the court function how it does?” and “what the heck is K. being arrested for again?” Although Kafka predicates the novel on these two ideas, the court and Josef K., never do readers explicitly gain a comprehensive or satisfactory understanding of the pair. In light of the fact that The Trial is an incomplete novel, Kafka intentionally leaves the function of the court and K.’s true character up for question. Kafka accomplishes this by never giving a true name to either the court or Josef K

possible as you discuss your disagreement. If this meeting does not resolve the disagreement, schedule mediation. During mediation, a mediator will help you and your business partner compromise and resolve your disagreement. Mediation does not require court hearings or trials, and it is much less

jury in a court of law. You may say well what is a jury? A jury is a body of people sworn to give to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. In this paper we will talk about three counties and how their jury system goes. And if they don’t have one we will talk about what they do for their judicial system. Jury system makes the court’s trial easier and fair. United States Jury System The United

The 21st century is one of rapid technological change. The internet has become an increasingly prevalent practice in many individuals’ lives, with its persuasiveness spreading into the social realm. Technologies such as mobile phones – combined with search engines, blogs and social media, namely Twitter and Facebook –have become widespread. The effect of these types of technologies has become apparent in the courtroom and poses many new litigation challenges, ultimately impeding the administration