Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

American opinion on the matter is correlated more to occurrence of perceived terrorist threats, less so than concerns of personal privacy there is a new attitudinal awareness, and perhaps reluctant acceptance, of the omnipresence of electronic surveillance. Claiming an inherent right to privacy regarding electronic communications through constitutional evidence necessitates examination of the legalese regarding such issues. There is no actual constitutional amendment that is dedicated to specifically

If the patriot act was ever repealed, they would have to stop and could no longer continue to collect and gather data. By the government’s authority, they must do this even if the public despise the organization, which they do. All those employed at the NSA carry out

several years. This collection was happening before the NSA Analyst Edward Snowden leaked these facts to the world in late 2013. The NSA was formed in the 1950’s, and during this time frame the NSA disseminated intelligence information from electronic signals for foreign and counter intelligence purposes, which supported the American military needs. Currently the NSA has refocused their spying tactics to technology driven devices. The NSA has an extensive “telephone-metadata program, since 2001, and

Malachi Olson Professor Titche College Composition 12/14/2015 Should Americans give up some rights to privacy for the sake of national security? As a result of the horror that occurred during 9/11, where a group of terrorist known to most of Americans as Al Qaeda managed to hijack two jets and fly them into the middle of the twin towers of the World Trade center more than two thousand Americans were killed. Both building collapsed after the reinforced steel melted from the intense heat created

legislation to help protect the citizens of the United States. An important piece of law that was passed was an act called the Patriot Act. This Act’s is supposed to help the government find terrorists and ensuring that another attack like the September 11th attacks doesn’t happen again. However there are a number of constitutional questions that arise with regards to the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act grants the government more power than it had before the attacks of 9-11. It takes into consideration the

states “...revises substantially the authority under the FISA for the seizure of business records, including third-party records of individuals ' transactions and activities. Previously, FISA section 501 permitted the FBI to apply to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("FISC") for an order to seize business records of hotels, motels, car and truck rental agencies, and storage rental facilities. Section 215 broadens that authority by eliminating any limitation on the types of businesses or entities

Along for the Ride: How Trump’s newest Cabinet members could be the Horsemen of a Facist America. 
 Two weeks ago, President-Elect Donald Trump made appointments for what are considered to be some of the most important and influential cabinet positions of any White House administration: Attorney General, Director of the CIA, the National Security Advisor, the U.N.  And just like President-Elect Trump’s unanticipated election to the country’s highest office, the appointments are equally just as startling

are going out with. Also, at the end of the novel, all the people and media gather at the “savage’s” house to interview him and see him whip himself. Similarly, in the society privacy of people is being compromised, courtesy of the USA PATRIOT Act. This act violates people’s right to due process, right to privacy and right to protection against unreasonable search and seizures. These rights are given to people by the constitution: the right to due process is in the fifth amendment of the bill of

a variation of the elastic clause called the Patriot Act, which allows the U.S to do whatever is necessary for the protection of the U.S from terrorists. Some of these actions include seizing the homes of Muslims citizens and spying on suspicious U.S citizens who may be connected to terrorist groups. Even though controversy has arisen about whether or not this is constitutional, the United States used the elastic clause to defend the patriot act. By doing this the federal government claims that they

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) categorizes terrorism in the U.S. as one of two types (Watson, 2002): 1. Domestic Terrorism; terrorist activities that focus on facilities or populations without foreign direction. 2. International Terrorism; terrorist activities that are foreign based and/or sponsored by organizations or groups outside the U.S. Victims can be anyone who died or injured in terrorist activities, they can belong to any country, be of any religion, culture, state, class