Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

also created minutely detailed records of those lives. As a society, we are not quite sure why surveillance is bad and why we should be wary of it. To an extent, the answer has to something to do with privacy, but we lack an understanding of what privacy really means in this context and why it matters. We have been able to live with this state of affairs, mostly because the threat of constant surveillance has been condemned to the idea as science fiction and a failed totalitarian state. These warnings

can be stopped. It’s a digital stop-and-frisk…. – Charles M. Blow, New York Times, June 7, 2013 It is without question that the heavens are watching us, in the obscured reality of simple humans we are only but germs under the eyes of the great intelligence from the viewing eye of the gods that rule the macrocosms. To this I say: Gods that rule the nebulas and ICIS1000 galaxies, have mercy on our

conducted by the NSA is unknown, it is easily assumed that the NSA has been practicing such surveillance activities for a long time, or as long as national security has been threatened. Nevertheless, the program started well before the tragic events that unfolded on September 11, 2001, with the Bush administration directing the NSA to begin secretly surveilling conversations between U.S. citizens and suspected foreign terrorists. Post September 11, 2001, the United States learned that the Bush administration

Snowden turned a critical eye to the NSA many people questioned the legality of the acts. The NSA claimed that their work was legal and had prevented many terrorist plots. However, evidence of only four plots was ever found. Even if the acts were founded in law, they still angered large numbers of citizens. Many citizens do not care if the spying is legal, believing that it is morally wrong. Government surveillance organizations have grown to be extremely powerful and are capable of accessing large

Of course 9/11 wasn't the worst thing that have happened in history, but without a doubt things definitely changed after 9/11. Times were really dark after this horrific act of terror. 9/11 was elaborate, and it proved how lax the security was back then in 2001. It will be 15 years in September of 2016, and we continue to learn more and more from terror attacks around the world. The real question here is, did we move on too fast after 9/11? We’ve had other terror attacks after 9/11 such as the Boston

telephone line to secretly monitor a conversation.”. Now that’s the definition that google gave me so I’ll try and explain it in my own words. Basically after the 9/11 terrorist attacks a new law was passed Called the “Patriot Act”, Which stated; “"Section 215 of the USAPATRIOT Act allows the government to secretly request and obtain library records for large numbers of individuals without any reason to believe they are involved in illegal activity." In other words it allowed the Government to easily

states “...revises substantially the authority under the FISA for the seizure of business records, including third-party records of individuals ' transactions and activities. Previously, FISA section 501 permitted the FBI to apply to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("FISC") for an order to seize business records of hotels, motels, car and truck rental agencies, and storage rental facilities. Section 215 broadens that authority by eliminating any limitation on the types of businesses or entities

Silhouettes of ones mental connections casted like a shadow on the electronically web leave us believing we are safe. Here we find ones own heavenly soliloquy of thoughts not aware that the room is darker than we knew and can not see the light of others viewers glares. On the interface of the internet we intrust the recipes of our daily life are thrown away like a grocery store end transition. This is not the case as the invasion of ones privacy is always in danger.Through a government run program

ever-expanding enigma that is the internet and technology, there is the constant question of privacy; how does the US monitor its citizens or foreign nations? Edward Snowden, a man who risked himself to bring details about the United States National Security Agency to light; the National Security Agency (NSA) is the government agency responsible for surveillance on foreign countries as well as the US itself. How do these two tie together? Or how did the NSA let Snowden, or others before him, get into through

care providers (4.4). If the NSA stores this sensitive data and able to access it, what keeps the data from being open to anyone with means of obtaining it. In order to legally take data from a citizen the NSA must get a warrant in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts. In 1979, A Supreme Court ruling found the NSA guilty of storing data illegally, after the ruling the NSA continues to still store data