Foxconn

great company; however, there have been many conflicts, especially overseas with Foxconn. This factory does not follow Apple regulation and policies, and the main one is the Suppliers Code that concerns workers’ living conditions and the environment they work in. At Foxconn, there have been many conflicts, and Apple is trying to fix it. Foxconn, located in China, is the largest electronic manufacturer in the world. Foxconn manufactures iPhones and iPads and has over thousands of employees. The issue

necessary to think about the problem of rule by using a real modern business to be a case study. According to Foxconn 's employee, "hundreds of people work in the workshops but they are not allowed to talk to each other"(Moore, 2010), if they talk, they will get bad mark in their record, and they will be shouted, even be fined. Target is an important thing for the manufacturing company like Foxconn, they focus on efficiency, productivity, and profits. It is common to see this situation in modern manufacturing

seller 's market at that time. But nowadays it is buyer 's market, which demands personalized and high quality products, so scientific management may not be pretty appropriate in today’s management. Example 1: Foxconn First let 's see a Chinese enterprise. The world famous Foxconn technology group, now has become one of the world 's largest and most professional manufacturers in electronic industry. The management mode

years. Apple’s Abuses in the Early 2000s Foxconn’s Abuses Apple currently outsources its manufacturing to multiple suppliers in different emerging markets around the world. The company’s largest supplier is a Chinese based company called Foxconn. Foxconn Technology is one of China’s largest manufacturing companies employing an estimated1.2 million workers in various factories across China. This company manufactures products for some of the world’s largest multinational corporations such as Dell

the iPhone and their living conditions, ways of life, and overall character. It is important to understand that even though Apple is a very profitable company that sells successful, unique products, they still use a contract manufacture known as Foxconn that is known for their harsh work environments and poor labor treatment. In terms of the Apple IPhones different components, most of all its parts are manufactured in different places such as North Caroline, Ohio, Texas, California, China, and Kentucky

impact on the business and it can destroy the brand image of the corporation. In order to determine the cause and solve this problem, I will examine the ethic of largest computing corporation (Apple) in its relationship with its main manufacture (Foxconn). Then, I will try to consider and apply due diligence in supply chain management carefully to solve their unethical situations. Other hand, I will analysis the impact of supply chain issues to Apple’s stakeholder. Thereby proving the importance of

performance, at any stage of the supply chain process, may damage a company’s most important asset–its reputation” (p. 3995). Based upon a case study on the outsourcing of production activities by Apple Inc. to the controversial contract manufacturer Foxconn, this paper will discuss whether or not firms have responsibility for the supply chains they choose to utilize. The paper will also highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of Apple’s outsourcing decision, along with cost-benefit analysis

called the ‘initiative and incentive’ system. He believes that only when employees get incentives, will they take initiative in their work and put their best efforts in. (Freedman 1992) In Foxconn case, there have been a rising number of unhappy employees. In interviews with The New York Times, most hire in Foxconn last averagely a few months before they quit dejected and depressed. There have been ten of thousands who have already left the company (Barboza 2010). This shows that even the incentives

in Organisation and Behaviour, combined with information and research to identify reasons for the success of ZTE. 2.2 Scope In the first stage of this report, the historical background of ZTE will be introduced. Secondly , compare zte and foxconn organizational and culture, next Introduced the culture and organizational structure's ZTE the relations and on the impact of the business, then talk the employees in zte behavior and leadership styles, Introduces the principle in the application

Topics in GSCM taught by Chester Xiang from January 2012 to July 2012. For the exclusive use of K. SHEN Cisco Systems, Inc.: Collaborating on New Product Introduction GS-66 p. 2 Cisco proposed to use one of its contract manufacturers, Foxconn Technology Group,