Futile search

The police do not always have to have a warrant to conduct a search or arrest. If the police officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime is taking place they can arrest the suspect. However, they need substantial visual evidence to conduct a search or an arrest. As well if the suspect gives the officer consent they can search the suspect. Warrant is also not needed if the illegal possession is in plane sight, in this case the police officer can use the evidence in court and to arrest the suspect

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) involved the issue of the regulation of physical surveillance and transaction surveillance; compared to communications surveillance, legal regulation of physical and transactional is minimal. This case was a landmark decision on the scope of the Fourth Amendment. Charlie Katz was indicted for transmitting wagering information by telephone; Katz moved to suppress the conversations as the agents had not obtained a warrant authorizing the use of the listening

Correctional Facility, after spending six days at the Burlington County Jail. Florence was subsequently released from the facility after it was ascertained the fine had been paid. During his seven day confinement, Florence was subjected to two strip search examinations. The searches

In the case of Katz v. the United States, reasonable expectation of privacy questioned government’s intrusion of one’s privacy by eavesdropping (Hall, 2015). This paved the way for the Fourth Amendment to be dissected when electronic devices are utilized rather than physical means to obtain evidence. It eliminates the snooping of wiretapping by upholding conversation overheard through eavesdropping to be protected under the Fourth Amendment. Consequently, the matter at hand was the misleading issues

explore an issue at the very heart of the surveillance legitimacy, they seek to explain where the NSA derives authority to operate and collect data. They further examine the legal capacity to conduct such actions, absent traditional requirements of search and seizure, as defined by the Fourth Amendment of the

gave the office legal right to search the vehicle. Therefore, being the state judge, I would not suppress the motion to

I believe that several of the details are left out in the Legal Puzzle 2-2. Questions such as Did the Officers now that the truck was initially on the street and not on the neighbor’s property? Did the officer know that they moved the son’s truck without permission? Because the officer was asked to come over and to investigate the illegal substances on the parents property he was within his rights to do so however, the truck was moved without him knowing or the parents getting permission to move

In the case Terry v. Ohio, the defendant John Terry argued that his Fourth Amendment right was violated when a police officer conducted a search on him, and found a concealed weapon. According to the officer, he had been monitoring Terry’s actions prior to the stop in fear of his safety, thus, had enough reasonable suspicion to stop and search the defendant. The Supreme Court decided to rule in favor of the state determining that the officer may stop and frisk any suspicious person when he feels

utilize is using a keyword search. This is probably the easiest to implement in searching for specific emails. Keyword search tools generally come in two types, indexed or not indexed. An indexed keyword search tool depends on the index that it created in order to actually locate documents having the specific search terms. A non-indexed keyword search scans through the document with each search iteration to determine whether the specific term exists. They keyword search will accurately find documents

What are the four requirements of a valid search warrant? The four requirements of a valid search warrant consist of probable cause, supporting oath or affirmation, description of the place to be searched as well as items to be seized and the signature of a magistrate. Probable case is more than a minimal suspicion that crime has already or about to take place. Supporting oath or affirmation is an affidavit that is presented to a magistrate that should not be only an officer’s conclusion but full