Handgun control

Comparatively gun control laws with the United States and other countries: What could be done to reduce gun violence in the United States, by comparing gun control laws with other countries to see weather or not gun laws are effective? I feel comparing gun control laws between other countries to see how their laws are in effect with lowering gun violence, so we could get a better understanding on what we could do as a country to help reduce gun violence or to see if gun control is even affective

Owning a handgun in the United States is legal, and it has been an issue on debate for many years with no success so far. It is very important to understand that if handguns don't get restricted or ban from our community, consequences will keep raising and death statistics will speak for themselves. Handguns in our community are directly affecting the future of our children, they are responsible for increasing the number of violent death rate in the United States, and it also keeps having a significant

Laws 2012).” “This too is the case for California whose laws are also very complex; they don’t require permits to buy firearms, or the registration of rifles and shotguns (New York Gun Laws 2012).” “But California does require that registration of handguns and firearms that are considered "assault weapons" (California Gun Laws 2012).” Various law enforcement agencies in California record every single purchase of firearms that fall in to these two categories (California Gun Laws 2012).” The registration

used for hunting and protection against Native Americans. As time as changed and the US progressed as a nation, the amendment has changed as well. The control and ban of guns is a federal issue but each state regulates guns differently. Certain states have open carry, others concealed carry and different types of registrations on rifles, handguns and other firearms. States with more hunting rights,

Gun Control Guns are used all over the world and are controlled in some countries but in others people are allowed to have any type of gun ranging from automatic assault rifles to big rocket launches. Should it also be controlled in our country the United States of America? Many say no yes and many others say NO! In my opinion it should be controlled. First off when a person in America wants to purchase a firearm legally they have to pass a background check. If that person passes the background

how gun control single handily affects crime, advocates of gun control continue to argue that restrictions on firearm accessibility, handguns in particular can reduce the rate of firearm-related crimes, suicides, and accidental deaths.. People that oppose gun control argue that it won’t reduce crime, because it would embolden criminals, who manages to secure firearms, to attack citizens whom are to be believed unarmed. When it comes to debating the issue as to whether or not gun control is constitutional

top of the Empire State Building kills six people including himself with a gun. Gun-control advocates think that outlawing guns would have stopped the killing from ever happening. Pro-gun advocates think that it would have been stopped by innocent people being armed and fighting back. In order for an issue to even be at hand, both sides must agree that there is a problem with guns and gun control. Both gun-control and pro-gun advocates do agree there is a problem, pro-gunners

not do much to reduce the amount of gun violence. It was recorded that handguns have been used to commit 80% of the gun murders in the United States (Beckett). Handguns are the types of guns that are most likely to be used in a murder, but people are not advocating for the ban of handguns. Banning handguns has proved ineffective in several countries such Wales, Britain, and England. In 1997, these three countries banned handguns thinking it would lower their homicide rates. However, there predictions

Guns’ Rights The implication of gun control laws, meant to protect the nation, has been the spotlight of controversy for hundreds of years. Advocates claim their effectiveness is maximal, and they genuinely benefit the populace. Evidence contradicts these contentions, showing that gun control laws have been proven to be disadvantageous in their intentions. The absence of gun control is safer for the general public and ensures the rights of the citizens. Gun control laws increase crime rates in areas

to carry concealed weapons minimum the probability of criminal issue rate. The exam made by Cavanaugh and Michael (2012) found that students are not very supportive for concealed handguns on America university campuses, and large part of them even feel lower comfortable if campus without restrictive policy about handguns. In another highly publicized claim, Richard uviller (1996) argues that although people hand with more private firearms, the death rate caused by the predators will not dramatically