Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

I, Breanna moore, write this opinion to support or dissent on the case of Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier. I support the majority opinion because in the case of the article written it did mentioned names of the children’s parents without their permission for delicate and sensitive topics, which would have been perhaps distraction to the students. I do not agree with the fact that the school censored other articles that were appropriate. Students should have the right to speak their opinions, but maybe this

I, Jason Tison, am writing this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. My opinion is going to reflect on the majority opinion that the school didn’t violate the students first amendment and that the topics were inappropriate and that the school rules doesn’t allow inappropriate things inside the school especially in the school newspaper. For the minority opinion that having the right to expression and that the government should not take that way in which the

Supreme Court had a difficult decision in the court case of Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier, and they were right in their ruling, because even though censorship is often overused, in the classroom, it is often needed, and though the fear of a dictatorship in any place is often scary, it is needed in a classroom full of rowdy minors, even in my experience many of my classmates have inappropriate outbursts. In this case, the Principal of Hazelwood east high, Principal Reynolds, reviewed the school paper before

I Support the majority opinion of the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. This case was based on school newspapers I believe students should be allowed it gives them a chance to express they talent though the press. No one can take freedom of the press away it one of our amendment. The principal didn’t have the right to cut off part of the article. The only time he had the right if it was Violate words. Also if the articles are related to the school or reasonably things the students have a right. Students have

expression when interacting with students. Because classrooms are a nonpublic forum where teachers have a captive student audience, courts have traditionally upheld restrictions on classroom expression. Since 1988, many courts have applied Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier to assess the constitutionality of teachers’ classroom expression of personal opinions, holding that such expression could be curtailed for legitimate pedagogical reasons, an easy standard for school districts to satisfy. For example, the

Legal Brief – Bloodworth, Debra Citation: Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. United States Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit, 1986 795 F2.d 1368, cert. granted, Supreme Court of the United States, Eighth Circuit, 484 U.S. 260 (1988) Facts: In May of 1983, proof pages for the school newspaper was given to Principal Robert E. Reynolds. Upon review, Reynolds discovered that the paper, the Spectrum, included two articles that he deemed inappropriate for the school paper. One of the articles

forums in which speech is regulated must be established. The Cornelius Court established the first three forums. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Def. & Education Fund, Inc., Et Al., 473 U.S. 788, 797, 105 S. Ct. 3439, 87 L.Ed.2d 567 (1985). The traditional public forum, designated public forum, and non-public forum. Id. The fourth forum is the, “limited public forum”. Perry Education Assn. v. Perry Local Educators’ Assn Et Al., 460 U.S. 37, 103 S. Ct. 948, 74 L. Ed. 2d 794 (1983). The traditional public forum

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill opened in 1795 as the first public college in the United States. Since then, free speech and the formation of independent ideas and opinions have been seen as integral parts of a student’s educational experience. Unfortunately, through the categorization of public college campuses as designated public forums and the implementation of restrictive student conduct codes and debilitating free speech zones, universities are denying students the expression

principals, and superintendents. Since the first case in 1969, students’ rights have become even more limited in the classroom. Although court cases like Tinker v Des Moines have protected the rights of students, other cases such as New Jersey v TLO and The Hazelwood School District v Kuhlmeier have drastically limited students’ freedoms. The 1969 Tinker v Des Moines Public Schools case was the first case to discuss the rights and freedoms of students. First of all, in December of 1965, a group of students

Effects of the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier Ruling on College Publications Publications created by high school and college students are under constant scrutiny from their audience of students, parents and administrators. Each publication must navigate a variety of challenges including funding, staffing and their school’s administration. One of the most pressing issues facing school publications today is prior review, the process by which a school’s administration must approve the newspaper, magazine