Head of state

legislations that also passes those legislations quicker. A disadvantage is that Australian citizens don’t get the choice of whom they want as their Prime Minister. They get to choose which party they want to become “head party” then the house of representatives vote for a leader in the “head party”. Another disadvantage is that it is a very unstable government. By unstable I mean that the House of Representatives can easily vote the prime minister out of his/ her position. This has occurred in Australia

under the head of state. In federations, a governor may be the title of each appointed or elected politician who governs a constituent state. In countries the heads of the constitutive states, provinces, communities and regions may be titled Governor, although this is less common in parliamentary systems such as in some European nations and many of their former colonies, which use titles such as President of the Regional Council in France and Minister-President in Germany, where in some states there

08 Fall How governments are formed There are no codified rules in the UK to state how government is formed, in theory it is in the hands of the monarch – up until the 19thCentury this was largely a reality. However the monarch no longer plays any active role in this process. The party that wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons after a general election, its leader will be invited by the monarch to form a government. 2010 Coalition * Conservatives were longest party in HoC

differences between the Presidential system and the Parliamentarism system. If we take a look at our own country we see that it is a Presidential system that we abide to, which unfortunately has very little advantages to go with it compare to the United States where the only form of government that would seem to work there is Presidentialism. They have a trust worthy system there compare to what I believe in Ireland is largely dominated by what I believe, our corrupt government. The president of Ireland

to the United States where the only form of government that would seem to work there is Presidentialism. They have a trust worthy system there compare to what I believe in Ireland is largely dominated by our corrupt government. The president

known as the head of state and the head of government as well. It is composed of checks and balances of which power is separated into other tiers of government such as the legislative and judicial arms of government. The legislative is broken down into upper and lower chamber elected by the people. The cabinet is primarily appointed by the president upon emergence into power. A parliamentary system of government on the other hand has the office of the head of government and head of state divided among

would solve the most pervasive problem in American politics: oligarchy. Of course, so would a king. In an expectedly cheeky piece for the Daily Mail, Piers Morgan outlines the Benefits of Monarchy. He writes, “They're non-political, unelected heads of state. Why is this good? Because it means they're never campaigning, never lobbying, never engaged in petty Washington squabbles, never forcing unpalatable policies down your throats.” The benefits are clear, as are the parallels to Trump’s campaign

GOVERNMENT & POLITICS ESSAY HOMEWORK Have UK Prime Ministers become more Presidential in recent years? In recent times many commentators have pointed out that the UK’s Prime Ministers are increasingly acting like Presidents- of course the UK Prime Minister cannot actually become a President as the system would not allow it. Below I shall be analysing and explaining the factors that highlight the growth of presidentialism in the UK, as well as the points which suggest that the UK’s Prime Minister

of England. Answer: When Henry VIII was too young, Richard Foxe helped manage England for him. Henry started an alliance with Charles V of Spain and both nations started a war with France. Henry went against the Catholic Church and made himself the head of the English Church. Elizabeth I was jailed in the tower of London under suspicion of supporting the rebels against her sister Mary. Elizabeth defeated the Spanish Armada, in return making England the new superpower in Europe. Elizabeth rebuilt

president was not only the executive power holder, but was also perceived as the symbolic head of state (Linz, 1990). Further evidence of presidential power described by Linz in a presidentialism system, was the control they possessed over the composition of their cabinet and their administration. Furthermore even though a president is elected by the voters, presidents do not require a vote of confidence by the states parliament as they are independent. This was a major concern in the view