Helmet Law Essay

Helmet laws throughout the U.S. have always created a great deal of controversy. Currently there are two types of helmet laws in the United States; a universal helmet law, which requires all motorcyclists to wear a helmet and partial helmet law that has age requirements. The helmet debate has been a long battle between free-rights organizations and government officials. In 1967, the Highway Safety act created a federal highway safety grant program. Prior to this act, no state in the U.S. had

People should not have to wear helmets because non-helmet usage dose not cost the government more money then helmet usage in a crash there is no difference between injuries with a helmet and without a helmet, and a helmet limits personal freedom. Living in Wisconsin we see see many motorcyclist ride without helmets many non motorcyclist think that that rider is irresponsible or he has a death wish and that they are costing them more money in there taxes thats just not true many motorcyclist have

crash. If someone chooses to ride without a helmet, that’s their choice and they will have to pay the consequences of an accident, but other times it can end up affecting a lot more than just the rider. Although I agree that all states should have a mandatory helmet law I’m not proposing that idea because people don’t like being told what they can and cant do (like mandatory seat belt laws). Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s article “Motorcycle Helmet Use” states that there are currently only

throughout the communities that it overlooks. The extent of the laws they implement should depend on the health of their communities. For example, if a community has a high rate of motor vehicle deaths the government should enact a law that requires PRIMARY seatbelt usage as well as consequences for not following the law. On the other hand, if a community has a low rate of motor vehicle deaths the government has the right to enact a law that requires secondary seatbelt usage. Though the government

Optional Helmet Law Is a Disaster for Pennsylvania 1. September 4, 2003 was a sad day for Pennsylvanians. Governor Rendell signed the new motorcycle helmet law into effect, sentencing riders to death and increasing the tax burden caused by this new law. Pennsylvania is the 31st state to repeal its all-rider helmet law (Berenson 2). The new law states “no helmet is required for a person 21 years of age or older who has been licensed to operate a motorcycle for not less than 2 full calender

In 2013, motorcycle helmet use in Michigan dropped to a record low approaching 73%, falling from 98% compliance just years earlier (“smarter-usa.org”). This drop can be attributed to the 2012 bill passed by Governor Rick Snyder, which declares certain qualified motorcyclists exempt from the previous mandatory compliance law (“smarter-usa.org”). The repercussions of this bill including effects on long term state supported medical care, organ donation, and increased insurance premiums pose a major

Motorcycle Helmets have been around pretty much throughout human history. Examples of helmets, presumably for military use, can be found in the pre-history of more than one culture. Helmets came in a wide variety of shapes and sizes to serve a range of protective functions long before motorcycle helmets were developed. It’s a known fact that the t most important piece of safety equipment is your helmet. And although its mandated use sparks debate, there is no questioning that helmets save lives

to the motorcyclists who refuse to wear helmets as “donor dummies” because they can get organs in amazing condition out of the people who have crashed and hit their heads. Having mandatory helmet laws would save families the heartache and the money needed to pay for a funeral. Helmets actually used to be required, but are recently starting to be optional. Which in my opinion is the exact opposite of what should be happening. Truth be told, motorcycle helmets should be required for all motorcyclists

Motorcycle Helmet Law and Recovering Settlement for Injuries Recovering settlement against head and neck injuries may rely on your state helmet law and on fact that the motorcyclist was using a helmet or not. A lot of states enforce laws considering obligatory to wear helmets for motorcycle riders. Such laws can be a decision making aspect in your ability to get settlement for against damages caused during a motorcycle accident. Settlement relies on your state's motorcycle helmet ruling, the type

Universal Helmet Laws Required For all Motorcyclist Riders. Fatalities associated with motorcycle accidents have always been something that I feel very passionate about and it is related to my experience when I was a surgical nurse In an ICU Step down unit. This was my first experience as a nurse and I was shocked to say the least on the number of patients that we received from motorcycle related injuries. Some of the injuries were so bad that associated head trauma more often than not caused the