“Housing in Context – The Right to Buy” Report for Management Board prepared by Caroline Peters, June 2017 1. Introduction 1.1 Report purpose 1.2 Housing Policy 1.3 Report Content 1.4 Report Summary 2. The Right to Buy 2.1 Historical Policy 2.2 The Right to Buy 1980 3. Legislative Framework 3.1 Legislation 3.2 Further Legislative amendments 3.3 Extension of Right to Buy 4. Comparative Study – The Right to Buy Wales 4.1 Historical Policy 4.2 Legislative framework 4.3 Abolition of
Affordable housing has become the paramount issue of cities and dense urban areas. San Francisco is the posterchild of an unaffordable city that regardless of immense investment from blue chip firms like Google, Facebook, and their ilk of startups evaluated at $1 billion or more, policymakers and elected officials must wrestle with the housing affordability crisis that is considered endogenous to swaths of homelessness and record statistics on crime. In New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio has made
Background Housing Affordability in Australia has become the focus point for urban planners in recent years. In particular, South East Queensland (SEQ) has experienced significant pressure as the demand for property and affordable dwellings increases and population growth in the region continues. The issue has come to the forefront in discussions for local governments in the region and there is a real need to address the problem of housing affordability. The subject of affordability is complex
countries or economies that have housing policies or measures to stabilize the housing markets. Provide your views or suggestions on the best measure to stabilize the housing markets that could be considered or used in Melbourne. In 2013, Melbourne’s population was 4.3 million. By the year 2030 Melbourne’s population is set to reach 6 million and by 2051 the population will jump to 7.8 million. With population growth of this magnitude the demand on housing will undoubtedly increase. In 2014
answering preliminary questions of: What is housing segregation and what are the problems, as a result? What are the casual effects on modern community planning? Can solutions be implemented to desegregate housing for community planning in the future? The intended use of this framework will be to influence both policy makers and community planners toward desegregation. Keywords: Community Planning; Housing Segregation; White Flight; Racial
Background Housing affordability can be defined as the ability to access appropriate housing at tenure or price which is not a significant burden upon household income. (1, 2) Australia has seen a significant decline in housing affordability; average house prices have increased by 147% between 2001 and 2011. This was not matched by increases in income. (1) This decline can be attributed to economic growth, population growth, more accessible finance and incentives for owners and investors. These
that, since 1976, the residential population has doubled, with more than 240000 people living in the Area and the ownership share has increased by almost two times since 1996 (City of Toronto. 2014b). Accordingly, the City 's housing market is dealing with more and more housing needs (CHBA, 2012; Landau, 2013). Also, Toronto Official Plan identifies the Area, as a place to accommodate significant population growth by 2041 (Ontario. Ministry of Finance, 2014). As a consequence, the value of land in
Housing Vouchers Vouchers: More Than a Housing Solution Introduction Many advocates and policymakers of housing for the poor believe that to achieve optimal human development of low-income households the location of the housing must be considered as well as the quality of the housing unit (Newman, 2008). According to Newman (2008), housing of the poor has to allow for economic independence and self-care while providing a safe and adequate place to live. The debate about decent housing alone
As gentrification of housing stress continues, Local Government Areas (LGA) will lose lower income groups and assimilate into a predominance of higher income groups, effectively homogenizing the population and decreasing diversity. This trend will drive the housing market price up, decrease housing affordability and deter outsiders into joining the community. The existing housing units will experience financial hardships, housing stress, and a gradual deprivation of a means to cope with increasing
Today, I am going to speak about the affordable housing in Pittsburgh .First let me tell about why the affordable housing is preferred. People who live in affordable housing today want safe, decent housing for the same reasons that we all do. The reasons are mainly to provide a nurturing environment to raise their children. Another reason is to remain in the community where they were raised or to become part of a community in which they want to settle. Finally, to live in an attractive, safe environment