hypothetical syllogism essay

Act utilitarianism is the philosophy that an act is permissible (the right thing to do) if and only if it produces as much or more good than any available alternative (class discussion). Act utilitarianism states that an act is morally permissible to do if and only if the good that the act produces will out weigh the good that any other available alternative act would produce. For example, if you are choosing between sitting at home all day or going to volunteer at a charity, act utilitarianism would

H.B. Fuller’s moral obligations in this case are to do everything they can to prevent illegal distribution and use of their products. Being the leading manufacturer of industrial glues worldwide, it is impossible for the company to get rid of products that kids are misusing. Yes, the company can take steps to stop it, which they are by not selling it to retailors and small business owners in Honduras and Guatemala where the biggest abuse problem is. However, this company cannot be morally responsible

Can suicide be justified as morally correct? This is one of the many questions Immanuel Kant answers in, “The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals”. Kant discusses many questions with arguable answers, which explains why he is one of the most controversial philosophers still today. Throughout Kant’s work, multiple ideas are considered, but the Categorical Imperative is one of the most prevalent. Though this concept is extremely dense, the Categorical Imperative is the law of freedom that grounds

1. Kant’s famous first words in the Grounding are, “There is no possibility of thinking anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualification, except a good will.” (7) What does Kant mean by saying that the good will is “good without qualification,” and what is the good will contrasted with? According to Kant, the good will is good unconditionally and it is the only aspect of a human being that is good without conditions. In other words, the good will

two types of imperatives underlined in the work, but only one which deals with morality. (1) Hypothetical imperative (2) Categorical imperative (1) is a command that deals with if an individual’s desire to attain a certain end. For example, if you want to acquire knowledge, then you must learn. This imperative can always be posed in the form of “if you want (x), then you must do (y)”. However, hypothetical imperatives are not moral commands because it is concerned purely with personal desire, and

Khaled AlMarwani Philosophical Ethics PHL270 Dr. Elizabeth F. Cooke Question # 1: Kant’s Ethics According to my humble reading, Kant is considered the hardest to read, grasp and understand among the philosophers that we came across studying ethics. According to Kant, nothing could be called good without qualification except a good will. And the good will is the desire or the tendency to do your duty because it is your duty, not anything else. Thus, nothing can be gained out of an action

is a rule telling us what we ought to do. He distinguishes between two types of imperatives: hypothetical and categorical. Kant says, “if now the action is good only as a means to something else, then the imperative is hypothetical; if it is conceived as good in itself and consequently as being necessarily the principle of a will which of itself conforms to reason, then it is categorical." A hypothetical imperative commands actions that are instrumentally good. A categorical imperative commands

Imperative whenever possible. The Categorical Imperative is the foundation of my metaethics. In making actions there are many “Hypothetical imperatives” we could take. These are straight out of kant and were statements like: “In order to do X, I must do Y.” A moral imperative is different in that it is merely “Do Y.” A moral imperative can tell us which hypothetical imperative to pick. To have a real moral imperative it must be independent of context or situation. It has to be something that can

Utilitarianism is a theory that delineates the bounds of morality with respect to actions taken by individuals in terms of what produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The principle seeks to define first the morality of an action, allowing for the morality of a person to be derived based on the intent behind the respective action. The fundamentals of a person’s morality are then presented in a form that labels the person behind a morally defined action as either

Philosophical Ethics: Part A 1. Name and briefly describe the four main aspects of the AU decision-making process. i. Scope → Includes all those affected by the act, either directly or indirectly ii. Duration → Considers the length of time of each effect iii. Intensity → Considers the force or strength of each resulting experience iv. Probability → Considers how likely each effect might be, given that we don’t know ahead of time which of the many possible effects will actually occur.