Impeachment

Since the recent impeachment of former President Donald Trump and dismissal of his entire cabinet. The world can finally breathe a sigh of relief. People of all races, genders, and sexualities gathered in the streets to celebrate this momentous event. The wall between the United States and Mexico has been destroyed, refugees and the LGBTQ community are no longer being oppressed and the electoral college has been abolished. Although these two years have been difficult. Filled with the feeling of impending

The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson President Andrew Johnson assumed office following Lincoln’s assassination. Johnson had his own ideas of Reconstruction and tried to take his own course of action in putting the Union back together following the Civil War. A series of bitter political quarrels between President Johnson and Radical Republicans in Congress over Reconstruction Policy in the South eventually led to his impeachment.      Radical Republicans wanted to enact a far-reaching

2) The Impeachment of Drug Traffickers Each favela used to be controlled by a drug gang, whose leader was named the dono (literally, “the owner”) of the favela. Drug lords imposed their rule in lawless communities, often exposing residents to extreme violence when fighting rival gangs. They also influenced local politics by mediating the clientelistic exchange between favela residents and politicians. The Pacification Policy seems to have abolished the rule by drug lords thus ending their mediation

tumultuous investigation, a hectic trial, eventual impeachment, and finally acquittal.

On July 24, 1974, President Richard Nixon was to be presented before the judge for his Impeachment. 7 of his closest closet members were involved in a scandal at the Watergate Hotel leading to the blame for spying landing in Nixon’s lap. Audio recordings within the oval office of Nixon talking with family members, oval office conversations, conversations within other offices and phones within the executive branch had caught the attention of congress. These tapes would later become the lead evidence

Harding further asks us to confirm that the trial judge complied with the requirements of Md. Rule 14-305(e) when she ratified the foreclosure sale. Furthermore, Harding petitions us to subpoena certain phone calls made between her and M & T Bank officials. Harding’s requests, however, are not properly presented before this appellate court. Moreover, Harding has failed to present an argument that would overcome the presumption of legitimacy we afford to the ratification of a foreclosure sale.

go unaddressed. As the constitutional convention unfolded, we learn that the delegates realized they should provide for situations in which the executive had to be removed from office before their term expired. The remedy, as we know decided was impeachment (Milkis & Nelson, 2012, p. 36-37).

override presidential veto, impeach the President, ratify treaties, etc., and the Courts can declare laws and executive orders unconstitutional. The contemporary system of checks and balances isn’t working as Madison intended as illustrated by the impeachment of President Clinton, the government

affair and lies would cause for discussions of impeachment to rise. The question does come into play, would Clinton’s denial of the affair worth the cause of his impeachment? Bill Clinton’s partaking in an inappropriate relationship would all end with a downfall and taint his presidency. Committing in relations with someone outside of marriage is downcasted upon a society

time of the Aztec, Inca, and Maya to the Civil War were analyzed and discussed. Many of these concepts such as the writing of the Constitution, the fight for women’s rights, and the Civil War correspond with modern issues. As many call for the impeachment of Donald Trump, one must consider what the founding fathers meant when they wrote Article II of the Constitution. Did the founding fathers want the American people to be able to impeach a President under these circumstances, or were they only wanting