Intentional infliction of emotional distress

MEMORANDUM RE: Intentional Infliction of emotional distress Relevant Facts George worked for the Charlotte Bobcats based in Charlotte, NC. George has a contract that guarantees his employment with the Bobcats for a period of 5 years. Jerry, who is George’s boss, wants to get rid of him NOW. Jerry resolves to using tactics to make conditions with the Bobcats uncomfortable for George to entice him to quit. George eventually quits after Jerry turned off his air conditioner in mid-July

inflicted emotional distress which resulted in Taylor’s loss of twenty pounds, extreme nervousness, loss of his union membership and his job? Brief Answer Probably yes. Under Massachusetts law, a plaintiff has a claim for an intentional infliction of emotional distress if all of the following elements are satisfied: (1) the defendant intended, knew or reasonably have known that his conduct will result in the emotional distress; (2) the

question of whether our client can gain relief from intentional infliction of emotional distress occurring from witnessing a friend¡¦s child being injured by a vehicle that is out of control due to being driven at a high rate of speed through a school zone. Pursuant to your request, this memo includes an analysis of the relevant state and federal law. Issue: Under Kentucky tort law, does intentional infliction of emotional distress occur when a person suffers severe insomnia and anxiety

According the case, the Shermans claim that their minor child has been the victim of illegal detention and intentional infliction of emotional distress and among other torts. They seek to be compensated for all the damages that such detention have brought to their minor child as well as the medical and other expenses they incurred in getting him away from the church and “bringing him” from their intentional “brainwashing” of their minor child. I. Will Rob Jr. (technically, his parents will sue the church

are numerous types of torts which include assault, battery, negligence, products liability and intentional infliction of emotional distress. These torts fall into three general categories which are: intentional torts, negligent torts and strict liability (Cornell University Law School, n.d.). The following paper will describe a situation in Washington in which four legal secretaries filed an intentional tort claim against Clark County and the prosecuting attorney’s office for harassment and retaliation

intentionally. The focus of this essay is limited, though not exclusively, to intentional torts which are then narrowed down to trespass to the person. Trespass to the person requires direct interference with a person’s body or liberty. There are three main forms of trespass to the person, namely battery, assault and false imprisonment. There are also two other forms of actions - Intentional Affliction of Emotional Distress (hereafter I.A.E.D) and the statutory causes of action for harassment provided

As a result of defendant’s tortious conduct of battery defined as any intentional, unlawful, and harmful or offensive contact by one person with the person of the other when defendant yanked plaintiff’s purse off her shoulder and causing offensive contact with the plaintiff. COUNT TWO

Issues: Did Al have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his locker and his bag? Did Al experience intrusion upon seclusion? Does have a claim under intentional infliction of emotional distress? Did Al experience false imprisonment? Is Al protected under the Weingarten rights? Rule: The rule is reasonable expectation of privacy. In the Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry states, “The general tort, invasion of privacy, includes four distinct injuries: 1) intrusion upon seclusion, 2) appropriation

The above arbitration clause extracted from the Google Inc. Employment Contract can be used in the relationship between a university and a student athlete in the terms of the forms of conflicts and disputes that, if occurring, would be settled by arbitration. The clause lists examples of such conflicts, and states that “[Any and all claims] for breach of contract, both express and implied; breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, both express and implied” are conflicts that would be

for the actions of Tom Marsden, an employee of the church, under strict liability. Rob’s parents, Rob Sr. and Bunny, could file charges against Tom Marsden and the Church of Devine Light for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment. Tom Marsden intentional misled Rob Jr. and brainwashed him into staying with the church. Mr. Marsden also threatened and assaulted Rob Jr. by telling him "If you leave, you