International regime

Stephen D. Krasner, defined International Regimes as “Implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors’ expectations converge in a given area of international relations.” International regimes have the ability to change the nature of state interactions as well as providing solutions to intra-state wars. An international regimes ability to do this varies based on several different factors. These factors are influenced by the regimes foreign policy and their

How Effective can International Law be as a Regulator of State Conduct? Introduction When sovereign states fail to comply with international law (IL), it can be stated bluntly that supranational legal organizations are systematically incapable of responding with coercive or punitive measures. If the efficacy of IL is unabashedly defined in strict terms of coercive and punitive power, it is unsurprising that it falls short as an effective regulatory mechanism of state conduct. Instead, a better measure

Post-genocide Rawanda have been receiving considerable amount of funds from international community despite being a dictatorship along with miserable human rights record and instability in region. In today’s world Rwanda is facing one of the most serious problems with its political governance. Due to dictatorship there is little attention on vast majority and day by day people are getting poorer and less aware of their rights. Current regime is having full control over people and space. According to a research

Kehoane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. “Power and Interdependence” In this text, Keohane and Nye try to shape and define a new concept of power applied on international relations based on the notion of interdependence, which is a concept broadly used and misunderstood in the discipline. Interdependence is getting more and more important in defining international affairs, inter-state relationships and worldwide behaviors; for a good understanding of the issue, we should now define the cornerstone, the backbone

n a fixed exchange rate regime, We use the term exchange rate to refer to nominal exchange rate not the real exchange rate. Few studies propose real exchange rate instead of nominal exchange rate. the government announces the value of its currency in terms of the anchor currency, and the central bank is committed to buy and sell its currency at the fixed rate. The Persian Gulf oil exporting countries follow a peg exchange rate regime; they do not have the proper institutions and central bank credibility

discourse behind the drive for international trade comes from. In the second part I will discuss who the drivers of these institutions are, and how this ultimately affects the discourse and

In this sense, a regime of accumulation refers to "the stabilization over a long period of the allocation of the net product between consumption and accumulation; it implies some correspondence between the transformation of both the conditions of production and the conditions

“against” China? Since July 21, 2005, China has adopted a managed floating rate regime based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of undisclosed currency. The daily trading price of the U.S. dollar against RMB in the foreign exchange market will be allowed to float within a band of +/->0.3% around the central parity published by People’s Bank of China. The signal was initially interpreted by the international market as an indication that China would embark on a gradual shift toward increased

Firstly, anarchy leads to International cooperation. Under anarchical status, states feeling unsafe due to no supreme authority. Thus, they tend to set up regime regulating states’ behavior to prevent defection. In this case, states are willing, though not able to cooperate with others. Regarding the unit of analysis, neoliberalism believed states

Meanwhile, North Korea, long the subject of the domino theory, is now trying to maintain its cult of personality even as its regime transitions to a third generation, one that is widely regarded to be the weakest of the regime. Kim Jong-Un remains something of an international enigma, with little known about his life, but it is widely agreed that he has “…caused a perilous international crisis by testing a nuclear weapon and threatening to use it against America and South Korea. He even distributed a strange