Judge Judy

Sort By:
Page 8 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Good Essays

    and Society, entitled “Professional power: Lawyers and The Constitution of Professional Authority”. The second analysis being upon the relationship between the HRS and Chapter Ten of The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, entitled “Courts and Judges”. Finally this paper shall condense the relationship between all three of the aforementioned areas of research and give a concise conclusion regarding relevant findings. Chapter Nine has a strong relationship with the HRS in that they both describe

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judgment The trail court judge explained that Dr. Scott was negligent for failing to show that the growth might not have been benign. However, the judge ruled that the defendant had breached his duty of care. On the question of whether the negligence of the defendant was a contributing factor to the claimant being unlikely to survive ten years, the court held that the claimant would have had no chance to survive the ten year period, even with treatment. The trial judge, Judge Inglis, relied on expert

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Part I To start a discussion a cultural competence in the field of law and within the courtroom, it’s important to establish the definition of culture in clarity. Culture is “a dynamic value system of learned elements, with assumptions, conventions, beliefs and rules permitting members of a group to relate to each other and to the world, to communicate and to develop their creative potential.” (Obialo) Religion, food, language, customs, unspoken values and beliefs, clothing and other outward expressions

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Homework Assignment I: “Hot Coffee” The movie, “Hot Coffee”, is a documentary film that was created by Susan Saladoff in 2011 that analyzes the impact of the tort reform on the United States judicial system. The title and the basis of the film is derived from the Liebeck v. McDonald’s restaurants lawsuit where Liebeck had burned herself after spilling hot coffee purchased from McDonald’s into her lap. The film features four different suits that may involve the tort reform. This film included

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Case Of Canada Law

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Introduction Since almost past two decade the Courts of Canada, have been very firm while dealing with any case related to contracts or tenders, especially with owners and contractors, who use bidding activities unethically. In order to bring some order in the contract tendering system, the Canadian Court offered in awarding against the damages to the contractor in such unethical practices by several ways such as bid shopping and disclosure of the criteria of bidding to the bidders. The transformation

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    and one person is “leaning out” of the relationship. She continued to explain that because therapists lacked the models and protocols to deal with these couples, they were literally falling through the cracks due to the lack of effective support. Judge Bruce Peterson of the Minnesota Hennepin County Family Court was a direct witness to mixed-agenda couples and to the inertia of divorce once the process had begun. He approached Professor Bill Doherty of the University of Minnesota with an idea to

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper has several different agendas. Firstly, I will describe a firsthand experience of the justice system through the eyes of a friend of mine, whom I recently had the fortunate opportunity to sit down and interview him for his full story. Secondly, I briefly will examine the current justice system, using my friends experience. And finally, I will expound on some of my opinions of the current justice system after listening to my friends story, and discuss some of the new insight

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction Contempt of Court can be defined as any act which derogates the dignity and authority of Courts amounts to contempt. It can alternatively defined as 'any act done or writing published calculated to bring a Court or a judge of the Court into contempt , or to lower his authority is a contempt of Court. Further, any act done or writing published calculated to obstruct or interfere with due course of justice or the lawful processes of the court is a Contempt of Court. ' "Contempt of Court"

    • 3206 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To start off, for my court observation assignment I chose to see an exceedingly captivating case that had been frequenting the tabloids. Isidro Garcia is a man facing kidnapping and rape accusations after he has been charged with abducting his girlfriend’s fifteen-year old daughter and rapping her on an incalculable number of occasions for a period of ten years. Isidro allegedly forced this woman to live with him for a decade, holding her captive, forcing her to marry him, and act like his wife.

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    because it is about representing their client to their best ability. As a lawyer, it is important to protect the client’s interests and encourage them to tell the truth although the truth can hurt them sometimes in some cases. Lawyers aren’t placed to judge

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays