Judge Judy

The book “Judicial Tyranny The New Kings of America?” is a compilation of articles and speeches. It is compiled by Mark Sutherland and includes writings from famed Christian personality James C. Dobson Chief Justice Roy Moore, Ambassador Alan Keyes, U.s Attorney General Ed Meese, among others. The book is a call to political action. It is aimed at Christian readers and the writers all argue that Christian politics equals constitutional purism. It is specifically meant to invoke constitutional responses

four qualities that belong to a judge and those were to hear courteously, answer wisely, consider soberly, and to decide impartially. The highest legal court, the Supreme Court has nine justices sworn to always provide the people who come before them with good governance and equal justice under law. The best kind of judge is a qualified and qualitative judge who renders to its community to sharpen a nation despite the complexity of the court’s procedures. A judge who reaches their policy conclusions

400 magistrate courts. A summary trial is a trial with no committal and no jury. The trial is before a bench of magistrates. Most of the time there are three magistrates who are considered “lay” persons. This means that they are not professional judges or lawyers but simply are persons from the local community. Recently however, there has been an increased number of stipendiary magistrates. These are paid magistrates who are qualified lawyers. If one wished to appeal their case, it would then

Discuss whether or not the criminal justice system could operate without the existence of privileges to evidence. Within this answer discuss why privileges exist and argue for or against the end for privileges and societies interest in these rules of evidence. Discuss a minimum of two different privileges within your answer. There are many types of privileges in the court system. The two main privileges that are well known are attorney-client and doctor-patient (Wellborn, 2012). Attorney-client privilege

discipline provides. Forensic psychology furnishes his skills to determine the competency of a criminal defendant, the extent to which an eyewitness is reliable, psychological defenses a criminal defendant can rely on, and how much discretion should judges have in sentencing. Ross explains the new approach that this field offers and how it may use scientific research and empirical knowledge to handle these issues. (Counselor Ross was very general when answering). First Deputy Prosecutor is generally

biases exist within our court system when it comes down to sentencing. So, are we saying the judges are racist? This learner hopes not, but she cannot help but wonder if they are just based on the number of African American that is housed in our jails/prisons. There just seems to be an overwhelming amount of us incarcerated verses Caucasians. It is also amazing that some of the sentencing time that judges past down for the same type of criminal act (e.g., burglary, auto theft, etc.) seems to be worst

The role of a lawyer is to understand and apply the law in response to the needs of the client, while maintaining a duty to the courts and exercising professional judgement. I want to be a lawyer who does this by achieving justice wherever possible through the provision of services that are in their best interest of the client. After all, justice is important in society, and everyone should have access to it. As Aristotle said, the only thing that makes us the noblest animals, and separates us from

Abstract For this observation paper a classmate and I went to watch a court case in Sanford Florida. The observation that I made is centered on conflict management and resolution. The offense that the defendant was accused of was trespassing. The behaviors of the defendant, the witness, lawyers, and members of the jury were all written down and analyzed. The events that unfolded in the courtroom were also taken into consideration when analyzing the information. Verbal and non-verbal styles were identified

a) If I were the Crown prosecutor, I would start off with the full code test from the CPS 2013 Code for Crown Prosecutors. The decision on whether or not to charge a case against a suspect is based on the Full code test. There are 2 stages for the test and the first stage is the evidential stage, being noted in the CPS 4.4, a case must pass the evidential stage in order to proceed no matter the seriousness or how sensitive it may turn to be. With reference to the case scenario, we should see

However, Scalia believes that judges shouldn’t have the power to interpret the constitution into common laws because it allows for too much bias in our court system. He believes it gives the courts too much power and that they don’t have the historical knowledge base to interpret the original intent of constitution properly. Scalia thinks that this job of interpretation of important amendments would be better left to historians then to lawyers. He does not think that judges should be allowed to create