Judicial remedies

9. Then plaintiff realized that on January 03 2017, she suffered a minor stroke due to exposure to CO poisoning and as of result lack of oxygen to her brain, stroke is a disease when the brain is robbed of oxygen. It was approximately 700 over-flights from January 01, 2017 through the early morning of January 03, 2017 and at that time plaintiff’s heart and breathing condition were in a very bad shape. 6. Plaintiff went to see a neurologist and was diagnosed with xxxx, this is a miracle that she

which lead the Acts of Parliament (statues) to be the main sources of law today. Decisions made by the judges are also essential today as they interpreted Parliamentary law where there was no statue law. During the twentieth century statue law and judicial decisions continued to be the major

where the third party’s knowledge falls within the first four categories of the Baden scale it will answer the requirement of knowledge under the second limb of Barnes v Addy. In what has been referred to as a “profound shift in the rules of judicial engagement”

one significant equitable remedy for resisting the enforcement of restraint of trade clauses in employment contracts, certain authorities tend to indicate that the most effective equitable remedy is an injunction, paired with declaratory relief. An injunction is an equitable remedy commonly used to prevent interference with equitable rights (in its exclusive jurisdiction) or to assist in the enforcement of legal obligations (in its auxiliary jurisdiction). The remedy will only be available where

INFORMATIVE SPEECH PLAN Title: Natural Remedies for Colds Specific Speech Purpose: To inform my audience of the different ways to treat colds using natural remedies. Statement: People should learn the alternative ways in treating common ailments such as colds since medicine, nowadays, are bought at a high price. INTRODUCTION I. Attention Step: It was a lovely day at school. I was walking to the canteen with my classmates

Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher (2003) 212 CLR 484 Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ MATERIAL FACTS: The appellant company (Youyang) was trustee of a discretionary trust formed in 1974 for the Hayward family. Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher’s (Minters) had been acting for EC Consolidated Capital Limited (ECCCL) since July 1991, all work in connection with the drafting of the documents relating to the subscription for preference shares in ECCCL was dealt with by Minters

its distinct power should be left alone yet bereft of a license to abuse… The call for that quality of rare disinterestedness should counsel us to resist the temptation of unduly inflating judicial power and deflating the executive and legislative powers. The 1987 Constitution expanded the parameters of judicial power, but that by no means is a justification for the errant thought that the Constitution created an imperial judiciary. An imperial judiciary composed of the unelected, whose sole constituency

Lawsuits can come from out of the blue. One day life is good, and the next, someone is taking you to court. This statement sounds like an exaggeration only because no particular lawsuit case is presented here to back it up. However, few people get themselves sued intentionally. It happens because of an accident, a mistake, or a situation that escalates into a lawsuit. To the defendant, its unexpectedness does make it seem as though it came from out of the blue. So why do lawsuits happen? Why do people

fulfil their official duties. The Chief justice presented three questions that needed to be decided by the court. The first issue addressed was whether William Marbury deserved the commission or not. The court opened the questioned if the law had a remedy for the situation. The final question was whether the writ of mandamus the appropriate legal action in the case. These questions were debated and the court confirmed that Marbury deserved the commission, but they found that the Judiciary Act of 1789

a pride of place in the Constitution by the Drafting Committee. Despite being part of the same constitution, a contrast is often made between part III and part IV i.e. between fundamental rights and directive principles. The main reasons are the judicial enforceability of FR and its nature being negative obligation of the state. The Fundamental Rights are enforceable. The directives are non ¬justifiable and are more in the nature of positive affirmations of the state. However in recent time, some