Judicial remedies

The vulgar V.I.P culture that has come to entrench itself firmly in the psyche of the citizens of the country is something that has come to be condemned by all and sundry . The practice whereby politicians and certain other ‘privileged’ members of the country arrogate themselves certain benefits in a system bereft of checks and balances has outraged many of the citizens of the country as being something contrary to the spirit of equality and as symptomatic of a corrupt and malaise ridden system.

Marbury v. Madison the power of judicial review was granted to the Supreme Court in 1801. The Constitution does not give power of judicial review. On Adams last day in office, several government officials upheld the case. Judicial review does not exist in countries that have a centralized or unitary form of government. The elected parliament declares it is the law of the land. Halsema Proposal to Netherlands has taken the initiative to start the process of judicial review. President John Adams

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Have you ever wondered what the US would be like if our government was a tyranny? Well, thanks to our founding fathers for creating a strong constitution, we don’t have to worry about that. The constitution was written in 1787 in Philadelphia. The problem was that the existing government that was under the Articles Of Confederation wasn’t very successful. Therefore, the fifty-five delegates representing twelve out of the thirteen states came together

The recently passed ‘Sentencing Amendment (Coward’s Punch Manslaughter and Other Matters)’ arose within a highly politicized context and has led to controversy. The amendment was introduced in response to a perceived increase need to legislate on deaths caused by king hit punches or “coward’s punch”. It amends both the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) and the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), by defining a punch to head or neck as dangerous act, introducing a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years for manslaughter

Current mandatory minimum sentencing laws are in dire need of reform. A mandatory minimum sentence is a court decision where judicial discretion is limited by law. As a result, there are irrevocable prison terms of a specific length for people convicted of particular federal and state crimes. As of January 2014, more than 50 percent of inmates in federal prisons are serving time for drug offenses, and more than 60 percent of people incarcerated are racial and ethnic minorities. The use of safety

Mandatory minimum sentences are the backbone of a racially unjust, overpopulated, and overpriced criminal justice system. The Smarter Sentencing Act is a bill that aims to reduce the mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug related offences. “The United States has five percent of the world’s population, and twenty five percent of the world’s prisoners. Our prison population has grown eight hundred percent in the last thirty years, mostly because of changes in state and federal sentencing

Papers 78 and 81 talk about the judicial branch, more specifically paper number 78 focuses on the structure of power and jurisdiction, focusing on the method of appointing judges and the tenure by which they are to hold their office. Paper number 81 focuses on the judiciary authority between different courts and what type of court is the Supreme Court. In Federalist Paper number 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the importance of an independent judicial branch and judicial review. The Constitution proposes

examines the judicial career of John Marshall, as well as the legal culture that helped to shape his political beliefs and his major constitutional opinions. The author sources much of his information from the formal opinions that Marshall issued during his judicial career. From these writings, Hobson presents Marshall 's views on law and government and provides explanations for what in Marshall 's life influenced those beliefs. Hobson explains that he has examined Marshall 's judicial writings

Judicial review is the idea that the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government are subject to review and possible invalidation by the judicial branch, most commonly the Supreme Court. It allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution, as they interpret the document. This process is paramount in protecting the validity of the Constitution as well as upholding the laws set forth by it as well. Judicial

units. The core responsibility of this council is to deliver the requirements by the judicial career. This, along with the changes in the constitutional structures lightened the rights of the Colombians as the human rights were added into the new constitution thus protecting their interests. Following the continuous low ranking in this system, the World Bank, in 2009 introduced projects that strengthen the judicial operations in Colombia. This project reinforced the activities of the Interior and Justice