Juror Essay

to convey this idea. Effectively, Rose’s style and use of character foils is a great indicator that supports this specific theme. The greatest and most obvious example of a character foil that supports the theme is the foil of juror four and juror twelve. While the jurors start arguing

against teenagers. The particular juror that had a problem with people from the slums is Juror Number 10. He constantly calls

there are twelve jurors, and all but one of those men thought the boy was guilty without even discussing their thoughts amongst themselves. Once the men were in their room to make a decision whether the boy is guilty or not, if the one juror hadn't voted not guilty, the boy would've been sent straight to death row. This movie was a great example of how the court system today has many flaws in it. Whenever a felon is up to be judged, their life depends on the decisions of the jurors on the case. A

When analyzing the film, 12 Angry Men, one will notice the reasoning is not consumed by the story, but by the characters and their involvement and interaction. In a brief summary of the film, it contains twelve jurors who are all participating in a trial. The trial is concerning a young adolescent who is being appointed for the death of his father. “Credit the power of this lucid study to the fact that the attributes, failings, passions and prejudices of these tales men is as striking and important

course on how the constitution and jurors can make for a fair trial. The film does this by having the plot revolve around a murder case that was blown over to what they thought was a conclusion, but after the jury carefully looked over the facts they came to a different conclusion. As the film progresses it reveals the workings of our constitution and the right to a fair trial. 12 Men must gather to decide if a boy is guilty of the murdering his own father. Most jurors before evening entering the room

opinion? In 12 Angry Men, Juror #8 was able to change eleven means minds after disproving facts that were brought up in the trial. In this essay, I will be explaining how a rush to judgement could result in an injustice. When the guard has the jury enter the room, they discuss if they should vote or talk first, they vote. Eleven men votes guilty, but only one man voted not guilty. Juror #10 says, “There's always one.” Saying of course someone said not guilty. The 3rd Juror was questioning him on why

actions were of someone who really didn’t want to be there so they were hostile towards one another. The image that was portrayed to the readers was an uninviting room that nobody would want to be including the jurors (page 5-8). Next, the text states that as soon as the arguing between the jurors had become to be heated in stars to pour down rain outside the open windows. Now, not only

Not only were some stereotypical but others just wanted the meeting to be over. The cast is categorized in general groups as passives, aggressors, stubborn passives, factualists, and Juror 8 being the loner. With some not wanting to cause trouble and others only changing their vote because the majority does, Juror 8 sticks to his decision. The group is influenced by the foreman which ends in a groupthink. The groupthink is the desire for conformity and harmony of the groups results in an dysfunctional

diverse in their histories and opinions of things. One would think that each person would gravitate to someone who is similar to them upon entering the room, whether it be a person that is of the same ethnicity or someone that is close in age. The jurors in the movie did the complete opposite in that they spoke to one another regardless of who the person was. Though it might be a societal norm to gravitate to those similar to an individual, the norm for that particular group was that one person spoke

Examples From The Film Goal setting is the first example that I found in the film. I saw this when the foreman says what the goal of the jury is and what is needed for the guilty or not guilty verdict. I saw that one of the jurors used problem analysis. This was when the juror started