Juror Essay

thinking. In the play, everyone but juror number eight jumps to conclusions about the young man on trial. Number eight helps guide most of the other jurors to look over the case and discover what really happened through him being unsure and not jumping to conclusions. Still, some of the others stay stuck in what they think happened. The jurors use their own past experiences to shape what they

The 12 Angry Men, the 12 jurors are ready to send a young man to the execution chair for the murder of his father. 11 of the twelve men vote that the boy is guilty but juror number 8 votes not guilty. This man was able to see passed his prejudices while the other men are seemly blinded by them. “ You can't dwell on what might have been… and it's not fair to condemn him for something he hasn't done.”( Wendelin van Draanen) In the 1957 MGM film twelve angry men, the jurors reveal their prejudices through

Then halfway through the movie, juror number seven then changes his vote from guilty to not guilty because he was tired and had things to do. He said this after the non-guilty verdicts went from one to seven (Fonda, Justin, Rose, & Lumet, 1957). This also shows groupthink the reason why

in Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men. These traits are mainly possessed by juror eight. The situation he faces, is that he must convince eleven other men of a young boys innocence, all of which believe that the boy is guilty of killing his father. In the beginning of the story, as soon as all of the jurors got settled, they took a vote on whether the boy was guilty or not. The result was eleven to one in favor of guilty. Juror eight was the only voter on the side of not guilty, for which he was ridiculed

situation. During Act 1, Rose states how every Juror is feeling and what they want to do after they get out of the jury room. Showing the audience that they just wanna get it over with whether or not the boy is guilty of committing a murder. It's true most people tend to just hear something and pretend to have heard it, just to get it over with agree without knowing what has been said or asked. On Act 1, page 3 Rose tells us that Juror 7 says, “Right. This better be fast.’ I've got tickets

could therefore, not sentence the young man. Throughout the rest of the film, we see more of the men thinking logically, for example, when Juror Nine realizes that the woman who claims she witnessed the murder, wore glasses and would not have been able to clearly see the boy if she claimed to be laying in bed trying to fall asleep. Another example is when juror number five, who grew up in the same area of town that the defense did, shows the proper way of using a switchblade knife, making a logical

minutes with the group sitting down and beginning to vote. With one lone person stating not guilty. That juror was named Mr. Davis. Mr. Davis leads everyone into grunts and groans as he tries to persuade the other eleven jurors to switch the vote. The most noticeable thing that has happened through the movie analysis is how well the college student body reflects the core values as three of the jurors. The movie shows three specific types of core values connecting to the college student logical thinking

1. Essentially when I hear a juror, I think of the movie “12 Angry Men.” This movie involved a jury of 12 that had to reach a unanimous decision in a murder trial. With that said, the primary function of a jury is to basically hear the evidence on the defendant’s side then they will determine if without a reasonable doubt the criminal offense on the individual is appropriate. Furthermore, the jury will then decide amongst themselves to come to a conclusion whether the accused is guilty or not.

how twelve men who were selected for a jury duty spent their day. All jurors have varying opinions for numerous reasons on whether the boy is innocent or not, but all men base their opinions off of logic, emotion, or just simply what everyone else is voting. Two men inparticular strongly used their inner connection and feelings to decide their vote on this boys trial. Juror #8, Davis, is a thoughtful, quiet, gentle man. This juror tries to put himself in the teenage boy's shoes to gain a better perspective

killed his abusive father. The jurors are from all walks of life and bring with them their own ideas, prejudgments, personal demons, and fears. This play would be considered naturalistic, taking place over one continuous duration of time and in same location. As well, it features language that sounds like how ordinary people voice. The purpose of this is not objective to show how people are but also why they are the way that they are. For example, we find out that third Juror is obstructed by the experience