Jury system

in relation to reinstating the jury system in South Africa. An independent judiciary is necessary for a free society and a constitutional democracy. A judge has to reach his or her decision based on principle and not to serve any political or economic agendas. Crucial qualities of any good judge are his or her ability to remain neutral and objective. The system that makes use of a judge can be described as an accusatorial or an adversarial legal system. This system consists of two parties opposing

Introduction The ideal American jury system is one that promotes fair verdicts through the unbiased, unprejudiced, and independent minds of the common citizens. The jury has to be composed of the common citizenry because the individual’s right to an impartial jury drawn from a fair and random selection of the community is specified in the Sixth Amendment, and was created by our Founders with the intent of giving the accused a fair chance in trial (Ginsberg, 2013, p. A14). Currently, anyone who

The right to trial by jury in the modern times originates from twelfth century England during the reign of King Henry II. This system may originate from an “ancient right for an accused to be tried only “by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”” (Thomas). In the United States, trial by jury is mentioned in Article Three of the Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. For many people, the jury system seems to be the fairest system and most unbiased way of determining

The jury system is an ancient institution, dating from early Anglo-Saxon times. Jury service is compulsory, names are selected randomly from the electoral roll. In addition, the jury system consists of 12 ordinary men and women who have the responsibility to make judgement based on evidence. However, there are many advantages and disadvantages of the jury system in the supreme and county court (Victoria Law Foundation, ND, A). Firstly, one of the advantages of the jury system is spreading the decision-making

Do you think the U.S jury system should be adopted by other countries? What factors do you think should inform a country's decision to adopt a jury system? I think the U.S jury systems should be adopted by other countries in the world. What is jury? Jury is a body of people (typically twelve in number) sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. US Jury System The use of juries to decide cases is a distinguishing feature of the

There have been several contemporary developments in the last century that have followed on from the jury system origins. Western Australia currently upholds a trial by jury system. In 1829, W.A. was settled as the Swan River Colony. Captain Stirling arrived in W.A., issuing a proclamation, which declared that the new colony would apply Britain statute law and common law. It didn’t take long until Stirling appointed eight free settlers to become justices of the peace, allowing them to now adjudicate

The civil jury system is one of the most important facets of American life and liberty. It is an important agent of democracy and has been since the beginning of history. However, today many threats to the civil jury system are arising, ranging from judicial issues to outside pressures as well. The civil jury system is one of the most important agents in protecting the civil rights of all citizens, so its demise would have a devastating impact on all Americans. It is imperative that people fight

Is the Jury System being Fair to the people? In the 5th century, around the Ancient Greece the jury system has been around at that time, but it might have emerged in New England during the 12th century. The Jury system or trial is a lawful proceeding in which a jury makes a decision on finding the details of the crime, which then direct the action of a judge would decide on. After the finding of facts the judge or panel of judges makes the decision on if the defiant is guilty or not. Why

Value of a Jury System The Founders of our nation understood that no idea was more central to our Bill of Rights -- indeed, to government of the people, by the people, and for the people -- than the citizen jury. It was cherished not only as a bulwark against tyranny but also as an essential means of educating Americans in the habits and duties of citizenship. By enacting the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the Constitution, the Framers sought to install the right to trial by jury as a cornerstone

right to a fair trial by jury,(Logos) but what if that jury is fraudulent?(Hook/Anaphora) The jury system has, and is, an essential part of our judicial system.(Hyperbole) The purpose of a jury system is to insinuate democracy, by having multiple people determine the outcome. Without the jury system, trials would be tyrannously determined. However, the jury system can, and has been corrupted before. We have seen countless innocent people be plead guilty because of our jury system; and vise versa. For