Just intonation

In 2008, Gaga had a become a pop-music sensation when she released her first single “Just Dance” from her The Fame album. The album went platinum, demonstrating the instant success Gaga received. Her rise to fame is accurately described in “Memory, Monsters, and Lady Gaga” by Victor P. Corona. He notes that Gaga has become the “first recording

the moral justification of war. Children often fall into this conversation, especially in combat. Children are often used as combatants in wars, and although this may be atrocious in nature, it dials back into the very first line of this paper. The Just War Traditions will be my starting point in this argument. Wars are fought by combatants but waged upon by States, hence we look towards Jus in Bello, which deals with the conduct of war. In this paper, I will look at the moral dilemma of killing an

One of the most clear and important shortcomings of the Just War Theory in regard to this conflict is the notion of Just Cause, which states that a war must not be solely to punish those who have done wrong.  In the case of the Bosnian War, the idea of what cause is justified and what is not becomes seriously difficult to understand. In saying that correcting a truly great evil is enough for a just cause, the fact that the Just War Theory fails to explain what constitutes such an evil becomes glaringly

Mariah Carey's skintight little black dress is heating up the conversation on social media channels. Mariah appeared at the TCL Chinese Theatre (formerly Grauman’s) in Los Angeles on Wednesday. Like many other major movie stars before her, Mariah Carey was the guest of honor at a Hand and Footprint ceremony to immortalize her contributions to Hollywood entertainment. As Mariah has done time and time again, she came dressed for the occasion and stuck to the fashion script by wearing an LBD and

For the victorious parties of war to determine the process of justice makes a significant assumption that those parties will attempt to apply an extension of the just war theory to include jus post bellum in that they will endeavor for a just and lasting peace. This assumption is problematic for three reasons. First, nothing guarantees that as a belligerent concludes acts of war that it has any intention whatsoever of establishing peace. Second, the victor enjoys the privilege of deciding what constitutes

Just War Theory is a theory that is designed to explain how to morally start a war and moral ways of acting during a war. The different sections in the just war theory are Jus Ad Bellum, “right to war” and Jus In Bello “laws of war.” Within the just war theory there has been some speculation from pacifists, people who believe in resolving issues in a non-violent way. Brian Orend critiques a type of pacifism, deontological pacifism, the pacifism that discusses not having a war since it involves killing

Vietnam War, which over half of Americans viewed negatively. My definition of a good war is very similar to the Just War Theory. This theory would categorize the wars as just and unjust, respectively. The Just War Theory has its roots in philosophy and has four major components. For a war to be considered just, the country must have the right to go to war, have a just cause, with just intentions, and it must be the last resort. These guidelines are set into

distinction. Option 1: Option one is not a good idea because it greatly opposes the 4 rules of war. By bombing the dam, there would be great collateral damage which would not be considered proportional as you would have the entire population at risk not just the army. This is due to the rule of military necessity states that attacks are to be directed at military objects, and the only legitimate goal is to weaken the military forces of the enemy. By bombing the dam, you are putting the lives of all the

rules of jus in bello (or justice in war) serve as guidelines for fighting well once war has begun. Some maintain that morality does not exist in warfare, and therefore object to just war theory. War is hell, the argument goes, and one is entitled to do whatever is necessary to ensure victory for one's own side. Just war theory, on the other hand, sets forth a moral framework for warfare and rejects the notion that "anything goes" during times of war. Belligerent armies are entitled to try to

Trafalgar was a just war according to the criteria outlined in the Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello just war theory. The Battle of Trafalgar was a naval conflict between Napoleon Bonaparte’s French army allied with the Spanish army against Lord Horatio Nelson British army on the 21st of October, 1805. Lord Horatio Nelson gave up his life to a shoulder musket shot in ensuring Britain become the most powerful and largest sea force in the world for 100 years. The Battle of Trafalgar was a just war according