Justice in plato

Understandably, this belief poses a threat to social cooperation and, therefore, clearly introduces a significant political problem. I believe that the best example of ethical egoism is displayed in Book I of Plato's The Republic. In this Book, Plato introduces the idea of ethical egoism, explains the political problem posed by it, and addresses the problem through the words of Socrates. I will use this paper to explain and clarify the arguments for and against the concept of ethical egoism, with

I agree with the point Plato is making towards Cephalus and Polemarchus. During Plato's time, Greek thinkers had already established the idea that the ''good man'' possessed four cardinal virtues: courage, temperance, justice, and wisdom. In Cephalus, Socrates (Plato), seems to have met a man who through experience of age, seems to have achieved the virtues of courage, temperance and justice. But as soon as it becomes clear that he has a philosophical subject in mind, Cephalus excuses himself from

Plato was the most brilliant and famous disciple of Socrates. He was born in May-June 428/27 BC in Athens to a noble and aristocratic family. His real name was Aristocles meaning the best and renowned. His nickname Plato was given by the term platys, because of his broad and strong shoulders. He was very good in the study of music, poetry, mathematics and rhetoric. It was at the age of 20 that Plato met Socrates and since then was mesmerized by him. So deep was his influence on him that he gave up

book, The Republic was written by Plato around 300BC and explicitly covers Socrates dialogue on the definition of justice, character and order of a just city. It offers relevant guidance on the ethical conduct, political theory and practice, and also serving as an academic handbook (Plato, Grube, & Reeve, 1992) Socrates believed that justice comprises a critical part of human nature. In the analogy of the cave, Socrates refutes the claim by Cephalus, who defines justice as repaying one’s debts and telling

Plato's Republic “the having and doing of one’s own and what belongs to one would be agreed to be justice.” (The Republic 434a) In other words the above statement means that justice, according to Plato, is doing only the tasks assigned to them by nature. This is the fundamental notion for his creation of an ideal city. It is both knowing what true justice is and where one belongs in the city that the ideal can be achieved. What this means to politics in the ideal city is that only

The ideal society as suggested by Plato is composed of three classes: the producers, the auxiliaries, and the guardians. The producers are the craftsmen, farmers etc.; the auxiliaries are the warriors/soldiers; and the guardians are the rulers. This hierarchy places the rulers at the top of the food chain followed by the auxiliaries with the producers at the bottom. In this society, each group is required to perform is appropriate function and only that function. It is the rulers’ job to rule,

Plato and Aristotle are two of the most remembered philosophers of all time. Being master and student, the two have had interesting propinquity yet gradually they came to disagreements amongst their viewpoints. Plato concluded that the highest reality was the forms, or ideas, while Aristotle refuted such concepts, claiming the physical world to be the most real. Rooted in different philosophical origins, the two began to build vast networks of ideals, often having completely different conclusions

Plato has been one of the most prominent ancient philosophers who dedicated his works to describe the principles of the society functioning and people living in it. While he raised a large number of topics in his writings, one of the most significant topics is the problem of morality which can be observed through the examination of Plato's understanding of just and unjust. In this part of his writing, the philosopher claims that a person acts morally unwillingly or due to the reasons that come from

position takes form in the Republic, Plato claims that only a very few individuals are capable of understanding how human life is to be lived. If it could be done, the rest of us would be best off it we were to let out lives be controlled by such individuals". This position held by Plato has been one of much discussion and disagreement over the years. In this paper I

philosophies from Plato, Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau will be discussed. While some of their views on justice and power are similar, they do have many different beliefs on what is just and who should make it so. These philosopher’s perspectives will be uncovered to propose what justice requires be done to Abbot Kinney Boulevard in Venice, California. While focusing on Plato’s ideas, the paper will critique his ideas from the perspectives of Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau. According to Plato, it is important