Language acquisition

Second language acquisition is a process whereby people learn an additional language on top of their native ones. Learning a second language can be functional to oneself especially when communicating with a person whom you do not have a common language with. In acquiring the second language, there will be difficulties that one might face as compared to acquiring the first language, which makes it harder to acquire. Our mother tongue is easier to learn as we would have been brought up by our parents

In concern to English language acquisition, there are several methods for the most effective way English Language Learners (ELLs) understand and retain new information. The two main camps concerning language acquisition are the sociocultural perspective and the cognitive perspective. From there, there have been many frameworks and theories that have stemmed from these two perspectives: The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP), Krashen’s input (comprehension) and monitor approach, Vygotsky’s

Studies have proven that when it comes to first language acquisition the critical period is described as the time between birth and puberty in which it is essential for a child to pick up the needed skills to produce their first language. If not, that child then loses the capability to pick up a native language and thus will not be able to perform as fluently as a child that started from birth. When it comes to the American society these days, most children come from families with monolingual households

The subtlety of language acquisition has been the most fundamental question in the study of linguistics and human development. From Bow-wow Theory to Yo-He-Ho Theory, the major theories on language origins and learnability emerged at mid-20th century and has been heavily debated ever since. Among them, the idea of universal grammar in which is usually credited to linguist Noam Chomsky, remains the most notable and controversial theory over time. He introduced and developed the t heory from 1950s

Abstract It's undoubtedly true that motivation in second language acquisition ( SLA) hints to the learner's attempt and desire to learn a language and their attitude toward learning language (Dornyei, 1994) . Motivation is regarded as a vital element in the develop of any activity . It plays a pivotal role in obtaining the desired goals. Motivation in SLA has been crucially investigated in variety contexts such as (Feng & Chen ,2009; Wu & Wu, 2008;Melendy,2008; Wang,2007; Lamb, 2007). As the components

First Language Acquisition has multiple layers on how the primary language is taught and learned. There are many individuals that have a wide range of theories and insights on how first language acquisition is developed and can be improved. Many of the earlier theorist, B.F. Skinner, believed that children learned language through imitation. While Michael Halliday believed that children develop language through positive reinforcement of language forms. Noam Chomsky, a more current theorist

Introduction The language acquisition process is disparate between first language and foreign language. In this essay, we are going to investigate how they are different from each other on several aspects: phonology, semantics, syntax and pragmatics. 1. Phonology: Educators and pronunciation model Firstly, there is a difference in educators in first language learning and foreign language learning. First language learners acquire a pronunciation by imitating simple vowels and surrounding sounds

title of the first article is Chaos/ complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition. The author indicates immediately the significant similarities between second language acquisition (SLA) and the new science of Chaos/complexity happening in nature, and she expresses her hope that learning about nonlinear systems will discourage reductionist form oversimplifying and explaining matters of interest to second language acquisition researchers. Feathers of Complex Nonlinear system: Chaos/complexity

Children encompass the ability to learn whichever language system they are introduced to, therefore a newborn would learn the fictional Klingon language (Hoff, 2006). Klingon is not a natural language such as English or Spanish, and does not adhere to all the rules of a natural language. Due to this issue, the child would encounter problems in saying everyday terms in Klingon. Also, since Klingon is a fictional language and not spoken in society the child would not be able to communicate with

important to speak more than one language for many reasons. In one hand we have that being bilingual leads you to new cultures, new friends and new knowledge. According to (Myers-Scotton, 2006) “Bilingualism is defined as speaking two or more languages with native-like ability” On the other hand “Multilingualism is also an interdisciplinary phenomenon that can be studied from both an individual and a societal perspective.” (Cenoz, 2013) Spanish was my first language acquisition when I was born. Making the