Legal implications

The autonomous nature of legal reasoning is the subject of much contention amongst legal actors and is understood to be restrictively in positivist Raz . In his paper On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning Raz asserts that legal reasoning - reasoning according to law - is an instance of moral reasoning, that legal reasoning is not, in the strong sense, autonomous. This view is based on the assumption that legal doctrines are only justified if they are morally justified. Below, follows an appraisal of

Introduction Community Legal Centres first began to gain prominence in Australia in the 1970’s. They were founded in an attempt to improve ‘access to justice’ by delivering legal services to poor and disadvantaged communities. Since then, the role of Community Legal Centres in NSW has continued to evolve, largely in line with the development of the concept of ‘access to justice’. As such, this essay will consider the concept of access to justice from both legal and non-legal perspective, in order

jurisprudence, legal positivism has made a niche for itself in defining itself in opposition to a somewhat straight-laced reading of natural law theory. Often the comparison is based solely on an exceedingly strong and doctrinal interpretation of the two competing models. In this paper I will examine and distinguish the conceptual frameworks of both philosophical positions, detailing the “strong” and “weak” theses of natural law ; while in turn also examining the implications of “hard” and “soft” legal positivism

Hart’s concept of the existence of a legal system is made out of these three differences. Behind the concept is a structure built with great care. Thus far perhaps this Article has injured only the surface of the network and has not yet come to grasps with Hart’s concept of law. Rolf Sartorius would agree, for he contends that Hart’s two minimum conditions for the existence of a legal system “establish nothing more than purely formal criteria for the existence of a legal system. As such, they could be

Companies Act 2006(CA) ; “subscribers to the memorandum, together with such other persons as may from time to time become members of the company are a body corporate by the name contained in memorandum.” This essentially means that a company is a separate legal personality to its members and therefore can itself be sued and enter into contracts. This theory was birthed into company law through the case of Salomon v Salomon and Co LTD 1872. This case involved a company entering liquidation and the unsecured

business and its owner. A business is therefore considered a separate entity from its owner. A company is regarded as a separate legal entity to its shareholders, directors as well as employees, all of whom have a limited liability. This principle was at one point affirmed by the House of Lords in the Salomon v Salomon case. In this case, a company is considered a new legal entity that is separate from all of its shareholders. The court did this is a one person company as is the case of Indri. Ramsay

now provide all the possible funding methods related to your claim and identify the most suitable one. Funding Methods: There are numerous ways which you can use to fund your personal injury claim; 1) Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs): A CFA is a legal funding arrangement in which you do not have to pay for my basic charges as your solicitor if your claim is unsuccessful. In other words, the fees are only payable if your case is won. In the event of a successful claim, you will have to pay your

practical authority. The second section, the implication of this analysis is elucidated to show the relevancy to our understanding of the law. The relation of the analysis with the there theses is examined. In the last section the connection between law and morality is used to criticize the Coherence Thesis and Incorporation Thesis, supported by Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart respectively. He ends the essay with observations about the relation between legal theory, law and morality. Raz defends the

settled. This essay seeks to look at the availability of legal aid in the 21st century and if it is still “open to all, like the ritz hotel” like suggested by Sir James Mathew. “What does "access to justice" mean, if not a fully FUNDED legal aid system? Is it a noble aspiration that should lift our hearts, or is it a load of meaningless tosh peddled by politicians and lawyers to suit their own self-serving ends?” . Before we can begin to look at Legal aid and its excerpts, we must explore Access to

Conventional legal composition, on the contrary, appears to be overwhelmingly complicated to the public. Occurring and then prevailing since the 1970s, the well-known Plain English Movement (we mainly cope with the movement in the USA) seems to have offered a commonly-welcomed solution to this problem. However, disputes still remain in the legal academia in regard to the actual efficiency of the Movement. This essay attempts to analyze the causes of the Movement as well as its implications from both