Legislators

How can the legislators do their job, if the government is giving them limitations? In article 3 section 24 of the Texas Constitution it states “members of the legislature shall receive from the public Treasury a salary of $600 per month” (Texas Constitution, 1876). Legislators are here to discuss and approve laws. They should have the power and abilities to request an increase in their own salaries. There are three reasons why I believe that legislators should get an increase in salary. First reason

The first way to alter the legislator’s methods in securing re-election is to place more regulation and laws on certain earmarks that may display false pretense. These earmarks are typically hidden inside other bills by the legislators in order to, “provide special benefits for their own constituents” (Ginsberg et al. 2015). These earmarks have actually been banned since 2011, however, they still play a large role in government funding, specifically in defense. These “zombie earmarks”

1. What if all members of Congress voted the same way on a given situation? This certainly is not the case. But imagine if members of Congress were not specifically robots, but just all felt the same way on a certain situation? Pretty interesting to imagine but the reason this is not the case is because of influences. There are three influences types of influences that sway a Congressman to vote the way they do. The first influence is representational view. Author James Wilson says “Representational

Representatives Should Respond: Their District or the Country”, attempts to understand whether voters recognize the incentives in a representative democracy and reward legislators for prioritizing district preferences over the nations. In order to answer this question, the author performs two experiments by asking participants to examine legislators who supported or opposed a certain bill. By understanding people’s responses, political scientists are able to evaluate whether the accountability principle is

Responsive can simply mean answering, and in the case of congressmen the question one should ask is whether they answer or reply to their constituent’s inquiries. The question of whether congressmen are responsive is important. Congressmen act as the representatives of diverse districts and it is part of their duty to act on the interest of their constituents. Responsiveness should be a factor that a district strongly considers when they re-elect a representative. A member of the House of Representative

Legislators are the basic governmental structures that represents the people of a state (Danziger and Smith). However, what is their true function in regards to who they serve. While it would be nice to think that they exist to serve the people, they also serve many other groups including legislative coalition, their political party, their party leader, their nationality group, the country, and the legislator’s own person judgements and beliefs. Moreover, is it morally correct to have legislators

Members of the Texas State Legislature have a unique way of working for the people, they meet with Texas House and Senate members and give their take on policies and laws. These legislators are often exposed to lobbyists and interest groups that work for their own advantage. When a legislator takes his term he/she is working for the public benefit and earns a very low income of $7,200 per year, but it is quite obvious that this work is not done for the salary. On the other hand, lobbyists get paid

When i was younger my parents always teached me to help others when they need it , and the one thing that i'm good at is speaking two languages , and with that i can help others communicate with one another . And i'm also thankful to my parents for giving me the opportunity to learn as i was developing instead of leaning as a teen because it would've been harder and a longer process. And that'll be known as a translator , being a translator is incredible because it feels great to help other and

lack of action and initiative to conserve water has led to California’s worst drought in over a century. This has led to panic reactions behind bills such as AB-1739, disregarding long-term economic impacts in order to fulfill short-term needs. Legislators proposing bills are not taking into consideration effects on jobs, business, and taxpayers. The answer to our drought will not be solved in a short amount of time, as a complex issue such as this requires long-term thinking. The state needs to

they have is by providing research information for legislators. Some lobbyist work for interest group of enormous wealth, that are willing to aport in research, entertainment, gifts, trips and even campaigns for legislators to benefit their proposal. The revolving door is a term used for when a former legislator also works in another government branch and vice versa. In some states, have enabled a cooling off period, that restricts a former legislator from working as a lobbyist in the same government