Linguistic relativity

In the essay of “ You Are What You Speak” by Guy Deutscher is saying that our language power has more power than our mind does. Also, having a generation that we can’t say on what we want to speak about. The writer says about a researcher named Whorf’s theory, that his theory turned out to have many mistakes, they have found many common sense and found hard facts about his theory. Within his theory, he says “our mother tongue restricts what we are able to think.” Throughout the reading, his theory

For all humans, language is the most common means of communication with others and it enables us to share our experiences and stories and to tell about our needs and feelings. For example, Yamamoto states that sociolinguistics see, it is ‘primarily through the use of language that people communicate with each other’ (1979: 146). We all speak one or more languages and as the main way of communication it is an important and vital part of our lives. There is many languages in the world and they differ

In linguistics, one of the most important—and most controversial, so to speak—is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. This blog post is going to focus on this hypothesis. Language is not thought Before anything else, we need to establish one thing: language is not thought, just as well that heaven is not hell. One might say that he is thinking using words and sentences, but this is not the case. I, for one, had always believed that I think using words. But this article from Science 2.0 let me know that thoughts

Language is a vital tool for human beings. Human language is a measure for communicating thoughts, ideas, and identity to one another. Cultural relations, economic dealings, and the shaping of friendships are all dependent upon language. While it could be viewed that today’s languages are the result of past language extinctions, the death of language signifies a loss much greater than just words. It has been speculated an estimate of as many as 100,000 languages had existed prior to the dawn of agriculture

thought and endorse political ideologies. Structuralist Jonathan Culler corroborates Foucault’s dissertation in his book, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature, by asserting that language “governs the individual and determines meaning” (Culler, 1968). He elaborates on this notion by construing that the linguistic-structuralist model can assist in “formulating the rules of particular systems of convention rather than simply affirm their existence" (Culler, 1968). When

What is language? The most basic definition is; "the system of words or signs that people use to express thoughts and feelings to each other" (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). While this is true, there’s more to language than just vocal expression, it’s a huge part of culture and our individual identity (Yamamoto, Matthias, and Villalón, 2008). Language, like many animals and trends, can vanish. Around 400 languages have gone extinct over the past century, and it’s been estimated by many linguists that 50%

Multilingualism: How To Understand Others Language is one of mankind’s most powerful inventions. From the scribbles in caves, thousand-page stories of a French Revolution, to men and women standing in front of thousands eager to listen; the written, spoken, and oration of language is a vital component of the human experience. Interestingly, the greater an individual’s mastery of language the greater his or her ability to understand the world itself, and more importantly those that live on it. The

languages were born from the same linguistic branches, but “no two languages are actually similar to be considered as representing the same social reality” (Kramsch, 2014, p. 32). Applied linguistic research has concluded three categories to explicitly expose the relations between languages and realities: “semiotic relativity, linguistic relativity and discursive relativity” (Kramsch, 2014, p. 32). According to Vygotsky (1980), a semiotic system is made up of both linguistic symbols and cognitive methods

“cross-disciplinary field,” stemming from findings from areas such as cognitive psychology, theoretical linguistics, phonetics, neurology, discourse analysis, semantics, and education. Essentially, the field explores the cognitive processes that underlie the function, storage, and acquisition of language. While psycholinguists understand that language users are unique individuals that possess different linguistic repertoires, their primary aim is to research general patterns of behavior across the human mind

What is a semantic field and why is it important in the composition of written communication? Give specific examples to support your answer. According to Brinton (2000) the term ‘’semantic field denotes a segment of reality symbolized by a set of related words’’, or more broadly speaking, refers to a group of terms that share a similar meaning. It was first established by German Scholar J.Trier in the 1930’s who stated ‘’the vocabulary of language is an integrated system of lexemes interrelated