Lucrezia Borgia

Sort By:
Page 4 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Better Essays

    The novel is broken up into 26 chapters, each revolving around one method of ascension. Chapter 8 focuses on a prince rising up to power by doing “cruel” “immoral deeds ”Machiavelli notes that the prince should devise a plan where he can rise to power quickly so that all the wicked deeds could be done in one fell swoop so that he does not need to commit any more evil during their reign. However chapter 7 is called conquest through fortune. This is the concept of rising to power through luck or the

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince is a renown political treatise written in the 16th century by an Italian diplomat Niccoló Machiavelli. Throughout history it has been read by those interested in politics and used as guide for many famous dictators in recent times such as Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. In this treatise, Machiavelli asserts key principles that lay out the foundation of how to gain and maintain power for those who seek it. These key methods which were originally intended as a guide for an efficient democratic

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Machiavellian Government

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicolo Machiavelli said of the prince, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are.” That is precisely what is happening in today’s society with certain modern governments. There is a great difference between the philosophy of modern governments and kingdoms in the Renaissance. Machiavelli explains certain traits that every single ruler should have to maintain his rule over his subjects. Modern day governments have exhibited certain forms of Machiavellianism. Even though

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Prince, by Niccoló Machiavelli, is a how to rule guide for sovereigns. It was written in 1513 but published only in 1532, nearly five years after Machiavelli’s death. The book was composed to tell sovereigns how to rule, but some scholars say it is more on how not to rule. From how to act as a prince to how not to attack in war, Machiavelli discusses it all. He was a regular citizen in Florence, but claimed he knew more about the art of ruling than princes did, he watched Italy rise and fall

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Can five century old ideas still be relevant in modern times? Niccolo Machiavelli, author of The Prince, wrote a book to give advice to rulers both young and old. He introduced a multitude of bold ideas that help a prince rise to power and prosper there. Machiavelli’s concepts include killing off competitors, the prince and army becoming one, and using cruelty to the prince’s advantage. Although The Prince was written over five-hundred years ago, the beliefs of Machiavelli are still useful as shown

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    advisor to Duke Cesare Borgia, was born into a time before Italy was unified the states within Italy were constantly being invaded. Machiavelli knew the importance of both laws and arms but also knew that any legal system, established or otherwise, would result in failure without such arms to enforce those laws. What is the duty of the Prince in regard to military affairs? Machiavelli held a variety of political positions, the highest being a political advisor to Duke Cesare Borgia,

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince tells a story about the desire of Pope Alexander VI to provide his son with fame, fortune and royalty. Cesare Borgia, the Pope’s son, also referred to as Duke Valentino took it upon himself to gain control of an army and property however he did not trust the people that surrounded him. The Duke feared that everyone would turn against him so he publically killed the man he assigned to govern the people; this act secured Cesare’s role as leader. Machiavelli could

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    y Meek Sec. 073, Final Exam 1) THE PRINCE Dear, Mr. Machiavelli, Recently I have read your book, The Prince in my scholarly pursuits and I believe that your book is entirely misunderstood. You are made out to be a ruthless man who embodies the phrase “the ends justify the means”. While your book does promote somewhat pragmatic tactics, it is a manual for how a ruler should conduct himself and more importantly preserve his own life, and while some of these pragmatisms are morally questionable

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli describes the prince as one that is unbound by emotional restraints, abstaining from standard morality to maintain his power, yet decisive in action and free of hatred. Throughout the play, Hamlet, there are many decisions carried out by Hamlet and Fortinbras that either reflects or diverts from the principles set forth by Machiavelli. However, when comparing and contrasting Hamlet and Fortinbras, you find that Fortinbras conforms to Machiavelli’s concepts more

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the novel The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli, Machiavelli depicts two types of leaders: those who are loved and those who are feared. Throughout the chapter, he goes on to state the positives and negatives of both — and it isn’t until the end of the chapter when he makes his judgement on which is better. At the end of the chapter, Machiavelli explains how both are good qualities for a leader to have as long as they are balanced. Similar to 1916 when The Prince was written, those qualities of a

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays