Machiavellis

Sort By:
Page 50 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my attempt to compare the past and the present, I must explain to you the inner thoughts and workings of an ancient icon known as Niccolo Machiavelli on his publication “The Prince”. To do this, I must first start with explaining the brighter side of an ill fate. William Enfield suggested that “The Prince” was a ridicule of Machiavelli’s own perception of political leaders in his time. All in all, declaring that the book was written to “pull off the face of tyranny” and that “men were always fickle

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Book Review: The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli The Prince was written about 500 years ago, however the ideas mentioned in it are as relevant to the society today as they were 500 years back. In the book, Machiavelli talks about the rise and fall of empires, and the actions that a leader can take to guarantee the states' existence in the future as well. Machiavelli focuses his attention on how social orders really function. The Prince is extremely complicated to comprehend, and concentrates on the

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    would mean nothing. In a way, he rebukes the Medici by saying that God wants people to act and to have successes, instead of sitting around and waiting on something that may never come. Even though Machiavelli believes in free will, he definitely seems harsh when describing the common people. Machiavelli calls the average person “fickle, easy to persuade, and nearly incapable of conviction.” (The Prince, 17). He goes on to say that the common people are more focused on not being oppressed then actually

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both Vito and Michael Corleone are apt Machiavellian princes. The juxtaposition of their stories highlights different approaches a prince can have. What Machiavelli calls "prowess" aptly describes how Vito comes to power, he rises through the ranks based on his talents. Michael emerges due to "fortune", being the youngest son he inherits the role by chance. In Cuba, bad "fortune" contributes to the botched assassination attempt on Roth. Michael’s inability to adapt to conditions he does not control

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    constructed to balance all things that produce a beloved leader. A politician during this time named Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the world renowned book entitled The Prince which advised soon to be kings how to maintain control over their peoples without being a tyrant and losing their head. In his book Machiavelli stated that, “It is better to be feared than loved, if you can not be both” (Machiavelli). He felt that when governing a state, a king was more powerful if he was feared by his people

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    things that he said was against the view of power. Machiavelli believed that the government is corrupted he also felt like everyone should die for example he says if you take down the king he will have many options with his family. he really questioned the if the rulers of this time should still stand many scholars ask the question of why he felt this way. the government at this time was extremely cruel and had do passion for any of the people. Machiavelli knew this because he had the chance to work with

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politicians used fear to derive benefits that include a powerful pro government sentiment amongst the people, a thriving middle class economy driven by insecurity and a desire to meet societal expectations. Machiavelli agreed that fear has the effect of strengthening central authority and improving societal conformity while discouraging public displays of discontent. 1950’s America also highlights the danger of abusing fear. Congressmen of the era had exceptional

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    6) If Machiavelli was trying to write a good persuasive text, he definitely failed. His tone is so condescending, or desperate, his form is too organized and up kept, but his rhetoric is definitely working well. None of this allows him to write a good persuasive argument however. The Prince has a definite form, tone, and rhetoric. The form is pleasing and organized. He organizes it first into the three main types of principalities- hereditary, mixed, and free- pausing once to address the

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince is a renown political treatise written in the 16th century by an Italian diplomat Niccoló Machiavelli. Throughout history it has been read by those interested in politics and used as guide for many famous dictators in recent times such as Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. In this treatise, Machiavelli asserts key principles that lay out the foundation of how to gain and maintain power for those who seek it. These key methods which were originally intended as a guide for an efficient democratic

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli wrote his book, The Prince as an instructional guide for all potential and current leaders to use as a rule of thumb in order to efficiently rule over their subjects in a successful manner. Machiavelli makes it seem quite important that the only way that a kingdom can be stable is for the leader to have all of the control, because things like nobles only get in the way, and can be corrupted. Machiavelli’s book has the purpose of mainly to guide leaders in techniques that can hopefully

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays