Malcolm X

and Malcolm X was one of the most influential civil rights activists of their time, as well as throughout American History for their core beliefs in the 20th century. Despite having the same goals, which is equal rights for all races, both conveyed their messages drastically from one another. In Martin Luther King Jr. “I Have A Dream” speech, he believes in a non-violent, civilized protest to resolve the problem which has plagued our nation for over a century. On the other hand, Malcolm X was in

Luther King, Jr. and one from Malcolm X. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s plan is to solve our political issues through peace and Malcolm X’s plan supports violence and any other means necessary to win our freedom. I believe that the plan from Martin Luther King, Jr. is more correct in politics and morals. I know this because Martin Luther King, Jr. supports nonviolence, and there will be less fatalities if we go along with him. He sees and supports us as people, unlike Malcolm X, who does not see us as people

Malcolm X was an African American protester. He argued that African Americans would never achieve equality in a society that was dominated by whites. Because of this belief, Malcolm encouraged blacks to “fight back”. He believed they should fight back in an armed revolution or at least to do so when being attacked. Malcolm believed that the African Americans should form a new society of ‘their own’ rather than trying to combine with the dominant white society. While he advised violence, he also spoke

about a man named Malcolm X. He was born in Nebraska and grew up in a foster home, Malcolm Little had a tough life as a young boy and got involved in crime. He went to jail for 10 years when he was 20 years old old and during that time he converted to the Muslim faith. The leader of the faith told Malcolm to drop his last name, which his ancestors inherited from a slave owner and replace it with the letter X which symbolized that his true African name had been lost. As Malcolm X, he was an influential

The Differing Methods And Aims Of Malcolm X And Martin Luther King The methods of Malcolm X and martin Luther King were very different but they shared the same basic aim, to improve the lives of black Americans. Possibly these differences in both aims and methods comes from the differences in the way they were raised, Malcolm X was born Marcus Little in Omah, Nebr. Malcolm X's father was a follower of Marcus Garvey (Garvey believed that Black Americans should go back to

civil rights activist; Malcolm X. Malcolm X or Malcolm Little was a huge key factor in the civil right movements in the late 1950s-1960s. He spoke against the injustice of the government, because of this many viewed his actions as too brash or extreme. Many viewed him as a righteous man who only had his set on equality and a righteous future for African American. Malcolm gained these views during his time in prison, it was in here that he joined a group called

Malcolm X uses forms of persuasion like pathos and logos to develop his argument that black nationalism is the best and only option they have. He uses pathos to sympathize with his people and claims that this is the current situation for all of them, and this is what they need to do to resolve it. He shows this when he states “until we become politically mature, we will always be misled, led astray or deceived…”(X,p4) this text really is there to serve the purpose of showing that malcolm X was all

Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X came from two totally different pasts. King lived in a peaceful middle-class family while Malcom X only experienced pain and suffering at the white man’s hand. Both took two different routes in promoting civil rights. King Jr believed that peaceful protest in numbers would lead to more freedoms for the African American while Malcom X promoted violence and wanted total separation from the white man (Howard-Pitney 1-14). However, toward the end of both of their

Malcolm X was one of the most important figures in the Civil Rights Movement. Not only was he an advocate for Civil Rights, but he was also an advocate for human rights. He was someone who you could look up to, someone who looked at the whole picture rather than just refraining to a small section of it. He put others before himself, trying to better the world by motivating others to fight for what they deserve as a human being. He not only did that but also preached the importance of knowledge and

A prison sentence gave Malcolm X a better education than the average college student. Such a claim challenges the individual to rethink the value of college education. You may be wondering, how is it that I am paying 50 some thousand dollars to receive an education, when I could have committed a crime and potentially learned relatively more? While I recognize the hyperbolic nature of this question, it illustrates the idea that intrinsic motivation is imperative if you want to obtain valuable knowledge