Malcolm X

In Malcolm X’s speech,“The Ballot or The Bullet” Malcolm brilliantly utilized the usage of several rhetorical strategies, ethos, logos, and pathos that are vital in successfully influencing critics of his philosophical views on civil disobedience and how there will be change is some kind of form. Mr. X usage of ethos is this speech convinces his audience that he is trustworthy because of the actions he has taken and the way he acts. “I’m nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when

Dr. Martin Luther King Junior and Malcolm X were the two particular most prevalent, most influential individuals of the Civil Rights Movement. Their tactics, ideologies, childhoods, and ideas of freedom differed in virtually every aspect. The ways in which these men sought transformation in society are where the majority of their differences existed. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a huge proponent for peaceful demonstrations, silent marches, and nonviolent public sit-ins, where he and his supporters

The Civil Rights movement in the 1960’s birthed the most prominent figures in the battle against racism in the United States. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. are immortalized as the men who stood up and spoke out during the most crucial time in US History for African American activism. Though often brought up in the same vein, the two had complete opposite ideology about how to reach equality. Their influence created many prominent groups in the 60s against mistreatment of African Americans

minister and human rights activist, Malcolm X, in his speech, “The Ballot or the Bullet”, articulates his views on how the nation should be reacting to current civil rights events and the discrimination taking place throughout the nation. Malcolm X’s purpose is to convey how crucial it is for citizens push for change and choose between ‘the ballot or the bullet’. He utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos in order to persuade citizens to take action in Cleveland. Ohio. Malcolm X begins his speech with ethos

through the way most people did. This is shown in the literary works of Frederick Douglass, Malcolm X, and Sherman Alexie. Like these people, literacy isn’t achieved by simply going to school. It’s achieved through great perseverance and through great tenacity.

great leaders who fought for what they believed in. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are two great african american individuals who fought for equal rights but in different ways. Their beliefs come from how they grew up and where they come from. King for example is well educated and grew up in a middle class family. While, Malcolm X’s household was underprivileged and he barely had any schooling. Even though King and Malcolm X come from different backgrounds, they both fought for the same rights, but

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both influential leaders throughout the Civil Rights Movement. Malcolm X once said, “Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.” (Brainyquote). During the movement King and X created history by fighting for African-Americans to gain equal rights under the law in the United States. The goals of the Civil Rights Movement weren’t only to gain equal rights for blacks, but it was also

Richard Rodriguez, the author of The Achievement of Desire, and Malcolm X, the author of Learning to Read, describe the ways their lives were profoundly impacted, as well as altered, because of their quest for an education. Rodriguez writes about his academic successes, while Malcolm X describes his education as self-taught. Achieving an education changed both men and both men pursued an education for different reasons. In his writing The Achievement of Desire, Richard Rodriguez describes his

Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. The purpose of this essay is to inform the reader about which leader had the best philosophy during the 1960’s on topics like society, violence, and actions the two leaders have done. What kind of society did both of the leaders have in mind. According to king, black and whites should work together instead of separately as King says “The sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together.” ( Doc B ) Malcolm X says that we should

Two contrasting philosophies may create one big compromise. Martin Luther King Jr. was a healthy, privileged, promising young African American. Malcolm X had a rougher and less privileged childhood. Both grew up to be two very different men with contrasting views on the perilous journey at African American Rights. Who’s view was better? You have Malcolm X with the separatist and violent nature, and MLK with the peaceful and patient view. Personally, I believe in MLK’s benign nature. MLK’s philosophy