Mongols Essay

of this word as meaning savage, however when some people think of barbaric, they might think of ancient tribes such as the Mongols. However it could very well be argued that the Mongols were truly the most advanced and non barbaric empire of their time, more so than any other country or empire at the time. The first reason this could be considered true is that “The Mongols conquered nearly all of Asia and achieved what all Inner Asian steppe empires had dreamed of, control of the continental caravan

Alexi Cabrera Powell P-3 11/13 The Mongols The Middle ages was the time of revolutionizing, war, and the mongols peak. . Although the Mongols were considered barbarians, people who l the reach of civilization Referring to being evil. they were very civil. They had a skilled army, were adaptable, and had a set of laws. The Mongols had a very skilled and strong arming and never lost battles outnumbered. They would travel by horse and split into small groups to surround the enemy to

The Mongols were able to conquer such a large territory within such a small time frame because of three main factors. The first was that the Mongols had a very ruthless mindset. They committed many acts that we would consider war crimes and immoral. The second was that the Mongols were very efficient and quick. They were very resourceful when dealing with resources, and their portability due to organization and their horses provided the Mongols with notable advantages over other armies. Third, the

dictionary the definition of the Mongols is “a native or inhabitant of Mongolia” (Webster). Mongols are much more than just inhabitants of Mongolia. They were great conquerors but brutally barbaric. The Mongol empire ruled from the 13th century to the mid 14th century (McDougal Littel). Genghis Khan and his descendants accomplished a lot, but the civilians faced many hardships. It seems as if they came and left in a matter of only a couple of years. The legacy of the Mongols should be evaluated based on

The Mongols were one of the key nomadic groups, which were originally pastoralists. From 600 C.E. to 1450 C.E., Mongols and other nomads had conquered a great deal of land in Afro-Eurasia. In those lands, a benevolence of religious tolerance, as well as culture, allowed for diffusion of techniques in which the Mongols could diverge. Sometimes the Afro-Eurasian nomads would impact others caused by dissemination of many aspects of a variety of cultures, including religion and social structure, primarily

aspects of Mongol life can be interpreted as barbaric, but for the majority of their life there is a logical reason for everything they do. For example, between 1206 and 1227 Genghis Khan was able to do what none of histories best conquers were able to do. He expanded his empire 12 million square miles (Genghis Khan). Throughout this expansion he left millions dead, but this was not as cruel and uncommon for his day and age. Also, in doing this he prevented many rebellions. The Mongols gained a ruthless

Everybody knows that the Mongols were not pleasant people and that they had a reputation of being vicious murderers, but were they really that bad? There is certainly a lot of evidence that would prove that they were barbarians. The mongols weren’t really that big of a problem until Genghis Khan came into the picture. He organized the Mongols into an army, a very powerful one at that. He wanted to conquer and get land. His first serious target was the Chin army of North China. After his attack,

tribe known as the Mongols conquered a large portion of the world, including the Middle east, Asia, and Eastern Europe. In this period, they took numerous lives in the process in incredibly gruesome and disturbing ways, as their way of showing power. It is undeniable that these ways were violent, but was this violence justifiable? Was the reason why the Mongols slaughtered this many people good enough to the point that all of the deaths were excused? The violence and death the Mongols inflicted upon

The world has viewed the Mongols as destructive barbarians; however, the Mongols viewed themselves as soldiers. The perception of themselves is important because they did not believe it was destructive to unite a world empire. They believed that because they were soldiers, anyone in their path could be taken down by force. The nations that defined Mongols as destructive are the same people that resisted joining their empire. The Mongol’s obsession with power, dedication to their leader, and their

The Mongols were people I wouldn’t want to come across. They were very brutal with their killings of the innocent, the way they conquered countries and cities and their way of life. The peace was kept between Mongols. Genghis Khan and Khwarazm had a peace treaty keeping them in peace. Although it was peaceful, that doesn’t mean it can’t be broken. A Mongol caravan entered Khwarazm with 150 people from Mongolia, and they were all murdered. Genghis Khan wasn’t too thrilled to hear about what had happened