Montgomery Gentry

University, was directly referring to Burns’s poem, “The Soldier’s Return”. This poem emanates the issue of treatment towards soldiers in the 17th century. Burns’ ideology has transcended poems and leaked into the musical industry. “Didn’t I”, by Montgomery Gentry captures the same idea that Burns’s poem did, the underappreciation and mistreatment of soldiers after they have sacrificed so much for their country. “Didn’t I” is a song that transmits the thoughts of soldiers to the

In MacNamara (1803), Captain James MacNamara is brought to trial at the Old Bailey on manslaughter charges stemming from a duel in which MacNamara killed his adversary, Colonel Robert Montgomery. Interestingly, an examination of the trial proceedings demonstrates that the defence focused on the defendant’s honourability. Rather than focus on the defendant’s criminal actions, the defence sought to counter the prosecution by highlighting the defendant’s actions in relation to another code, the English

Life on a manor was very diverse depending on your social status during the medieval period in Europe. This essay will discuss the life of people during the Middle Ages in Europe. It will first give background on how feudalism began and explain the feudal classes on a manor. Next the paper will inform about the manor system and relationships between lords and serfs. It will then expand on the actual lives of individuals who lived on a manor. After that it will explain the differences in the

George Edward Woodberry once said, “Shakespeare is, essentially, the emanation of the Renaissance. The overflow of his fame on the Continent in later years was but the sequel of the flood of the Renaissance in Western Europe. He was the child of that great movement, and marks its height as it penetrated the North with civilization” (“George Edward Woodberry Quote”). The Renaissance, as Woodberry stated within his quote, would not have been as popular if it was not for William Shakespeare. He is a

include dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts, and barons (Ray 37). Knights and baronets were not included in this class. They were considered commoners (Ray 38). The gentry was a very wide class. Land-owning males in the gentry, like Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice, were called gentlemen (Ray 39; Gao). Ladies were also considered gentry (Ray 12). With all of these different classes, one might say that social classes played a big factor in Regency England society. The way people lived in Regency England

meat” that contained precious little meat, made of things like, milk cheese, butter, eggs, bread, and pottages. These were sometimes derivative of fish, rabbit, or bird. Killing larger game in the forest was considered poaching and was very dangerous. Gentry and rich folks ate “brown meats” like: beef, venison, mutton, and pork. The poor also ate a lot more vegetables than the rich that insisted on eating only greens that were fancily prepared. Peasants had easy access to beef, pork, and other high-end

Document 1) A: The Feudalism provided protection and military services for their families. Nobles agreed to give their loyalty to the king. As the peasants worked the land for the knights and nobles and which they gave to them was protection and a portion of the harvest to feed their families. Document 2) A: The manor was a largely self sufficient system in which the lord’s land was farmed by his serfs slaves bound to the land. The manor didn’t just include farmers, but artisans who had provided

Manorialism was an economic structure during the high middle ages that consisted of a lord and his vassals who served him and his wife. The serfs had more rights than slaves but they were tied to the land of their lord even when their land was captured by another lord. Unlike slaves, serfs could keep some of their crops and maintain their own family. Cottagers ranked below serfs and were only given cottage and a small plot of land to work on. At the top of the working class were freeholders. These

Feudalism makes sure everyone gets and gives what they need, making it an organized structure. The system made it easier to protect land and assured everyone had a role. When the wealthier people can't protect their land that they own, a problem arises. Why should lesser people be the ones taking the land? Enter, feudalism. The lesser people can now work for the manor and contribute to it's success instead of stealing other’s land and just being unproductive in general. Well, isn't it just a great

Life was very hard for peasants. Unlike the King and Queen, peasants would have to work. Peasants would have to work super hard in order to make money but most years peasants wouldn’t earn much money because they would have to pay taxes to the King. Even after that peasants would usually have to work from 3am till midnight.Being the in the lower class made their lives even harder. Knights and nobles were in a medium class so they got things like land, crops and clothes from the king for there family