Moral compass

A) Explain the difference between common sense knowledge and sociological knowledge Sociology is a scientific study of society. It aims to provide an objective understanding of social occurring which can be used to explain social issues. As sociology is a science, research is based on methodology and data. Sociologists will develop a hypothesis which they aim to prove via testing and data collecting. This can be completed by using either qualitive or quantative research methods. The findings can

unrestricted moral relativism is incorrect because of the objection that our moral judgments is not just based on our culture or history. I believe that our moral judgments are based on who we choose to be. If this theory was true. This means that you are stuck with cultural morals for the rest of our lives. Yet a lot of people move to different places with different cultures. They start to adopt to new morals, and new way of thinking of what is right or wrong. Moral relativism states that our moral judgments

Ethical Relativism is the view of a society on right and wrong. The view of a society is the absolute truth and should be followed. I may not agree; however, Shafer’s provides a great example of relativism with his “honor-killings.” Shafer states that as a society in the middle-east, when a woman defies men—or is tainted (raped)—men can execute a woman because they “dishonored” their household. Shafer’s example uses Nuran Halitogullari, a young girl who was killed for being raped. While extreme,

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possibility of rational discussion in ethics. Using the readings in our text, show how these doctrines might be challenged. MacKinnen and Fiala define ethics as a branch of moral philosophy aimed to determine what would be the "good, right or just" pattern of behavior among individuals (MacKinnen & Fiala, 2015, p. 3). There are various movements in ethics attempting to explain the nature of human behavior and how it affects interactions

1. Cultural relativism relies on social ideals to dictate whether or not something is morally right or wrong while ethical subjectivism that truth moral standard are dictated by each individual. These forms of moral skepticism are completely inconsistent with ethical objectivism since it views moral as something completely untouched by any beliefs, desires, and will. 3. Ethical subjectivism makes us morally infallible by making morality “in the eye of the beholder,” which pretty much would lead

The next sphere is Ethical. In this sphere, meaning comes through in ethical obligations and logical understandings. These individuals focus on the goals they set for themselves. Ethical people set their attention and efforts on their own nature, something they have control of. Each ethical person determines what really is important and what is not important. So, they are able to achieve the things they want to achieve. For example, they look into their financial status. They determine whether or

means the rights and wrongs are based on the society in which it is practiced. There are two different types of ethical relativism: the individual relativism and the cultural relativism. The personal or individual ethical relativism is based on one’s moral outlook, while the cultural ethical relativism is based on society. There are many issues that relate to ethical relativism such as religion, euthanasia, abortion, and capital punishment. One example of ethical relativism is religion. Polygamy is

norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another (Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J.; Michael J. Meyer [Santa Clara University], n.d., para. 4). Our Text in this weeks reading goes on to explain while we might find that a set of moral values may be right in a given time or within a different culture it might not necessary

In contemporary Australian discourse, moral panic is frequently present in the reporting of social and public incidents. What becomes apparent is understandings of public incidents become portrayed as alarming through social constructions and mass mediated modes of communication (Critcher 2003). Due to a society’s mass mediated exaggeration of certain social events, these interpretations become widely adopted views. As the media and significant social agents implement such discourses into everyday

wrong. The two forms of ethical relativism are personal, or individual ethical relativism and cultural ethical relativism. Personal relativism, also called individual relativism, is based on the belief that ethical opinions are manifested by the moral viewpoints of each individual. Personal relativists believe that because there is no specific right or wrong, no specific opinion is considered reasonable or unreasonable. Everybody has had their own experiences throughout their lives, which has