Moral Theory Essay

to find the difference between right and wrong when faced with illicit drugs used enhance his performance. This case study includes many key elements related to moral development. Moral development is the process in which an individual develops the proper mindset towards situations based on social and cultural norms. Patrick began his moral journey when he encountered obstacles during his athletic career. His coach began to put pressure on him to improve his performance through using performance-enhancing

Moral panic is a phenomenon, in which people’s reaction to events and/or actions is exaggerated by the massive influence of the mass media. Public reaction is believed to be triggered by the hypothetical threat from groups or actions (even statistically insignificant), which are considered as deviant. Negative attitude to the phenomenon may develop even if the recipient of the news has never directly encountered it. Health and epidemics trigger the most basic human fear – of death – and frequently

According to Stanley Cohen (1972, pg. 9), moral panics occur when a “condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests”, and is useful for explaining the hysteria in Western society towards the ‘pandemic’ of HIV/AIDS. Sociologists argue that there was a social construction around it’s meaning and the way in which it was perceived caused by an apparent social anxiety or prejudice against homosexuals and other minority groups. This

the many different philosophical theories. This newfound information influenced my current stance when re-taking the inventory. There were a few questions which I had a change of heart in, most of these questions circled around the philosophy of moral relativism and moral absolutism. At the start of the course, I believed that right and wrong was not determined by one 's culture. I believed that every being acknowledges that there are certain overarching morals, i.e., thou shalt not kill. By the

centuries dating back to Aristotle and Plato. Are moral standards created collectively by different cultures differing from culture to culture or are there universal morals that apply to each human no matter the culture they belong to? Cultural relativism is the theory that what is moral is relative to the norms of specific cultures with no universal morals. I disagree with this theory and believe that cultural relativism is not the correct ethical theory for all people to apply. Although many Americans

seems like basic moral norms are up to the interpretation of current and societal ideals. Moral relativism is the belief that the concepts of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ exist only by comparison to a society’s moral code. It is an enticing moral theory in a world where so little seems absolute. Paul Boghossian, author of “The Maze of Moral Relativism” too believes that this idea of relativism is gaining popularity and importance in contemporary culture. However, he not only believes that moral relativism is

rejecting moral relativism in favor of moral realism? Moral Relativism is defined as the view that moral judgements are true and false only relative to some particular standpoint and no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. An interpretation of moral relativism is that it is an understanding that the ethical position of right or wrong is culturally centered and as a result subjected to a person’s individual opinion. Plato however spends a great deal of time arguing against moral relativism

1. Cultural relativism relies on social ideals to dictate whether or not something is morally right or wrong while ethical subjectivism that truth moral standard are dictated by each individual. These forms of moral skepticism are completely inconsistent with ethical objectivism since it views moral as something completely untouched by any beliefs, desires, and will. 3. Ethical subjectivism makes us morally infallible by making morality “in the eye of the beholder,” which pretty much would lead

technologies, which allow easier access to the different forms of media, means that these concerns are even more relevant today. The aim of this paper is to explore one of the consequences of media influence on the public, namely, the concept of “moral panics,” and discuss and the importance of said consequence, as well as the motivations behind them. The Influence of Media The media plays an integral role in connecting people to others and the society. Whether it is in the form of entertainment

Divine Command Theory overview Moral Nihilism states that the world contains no moral features and under this theory are two theories which are error theory and expressivism. The reason that both of these theories are under Moral Nihilism is because they both believe the statement that there are no moral features in the world and that no moral judgements are true. The defining point of Error Theory is that it believes that our moral judgements try and always fail to describe the moral features of things