Moral Theory Essay

When presented with a moral dilemma, differing moral theories will have different perspectives as to how one should approach the issue. This essay will demonstrate how one should approach a moral dilemma based both Kantian and Utilitarian moral theories. The moral dilemma in question is whether or not a teacher should lie about the grade of one of their students in order to ensure that said student receives a scholarship to university despite the student performing poorly on the exam due to a loved

Moral and Ethical theories often conflict with one another. It is hardly ever true that both theories agree with one another. Same is the case for Jean and Pierre. Following the four basic principles of Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, Social Contract Theory, and Kantianism his actions will be discussed in the following paper. Examining his actions, he was in favor of following the moral instinct of Utilitarianism more than any other theory. Rule utilitarianism is a branch of utilitarianism

semester, an entirely different ethical theory that I think relates to this topic on abortion is Kantian Moral theory. When applying this theory to this situation, I believe it undermines Mary Warrens argument, rather than support it, and I will explain why. First, I am going to describe what Kant’s moral theory is all about: The main idea of Kant’s moral theory is the golden rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This asks the individual making a moral choice, that will affect others

are stored in the pre consciousness. Psychodynamic theory believes that your childhood pre-determined your adulthood, therefor if you have an eating disorder in later life, it could be down something happened in

The Gilligan-Kohlberg Moral Theory Controversy Ethics, or moral philosophy, as a field of intellectual inquiry developed in the west for well over two thousand years with minimal input from women. Women's voices have been virtually absent from western ethics until this century. The absence of female voices has meant that the moral concerns of men have preoccupied traditional western ethics, the moral perspectives of men have shaped its methods and concepts, and male biases against women have

Moral skepticism is defined as “the denial of objective moral standards—is correct, and that morality therefore lacks any real authority” (Shafer-Landau). The concept of objectivity plays a part in the theory of moral standards. Objectivity is used in the sense that a subject exists without its perception, and that one can come to the same conclusion as everyone else given the same sources/information. An object is in existence despite of any opinions or matters, which is why this principle is closely

Comparison of Moral Theories A discussion of moral theories must begin with a discussion of the two extremes of ethical thinking, absolutism and relativism. Moral Absolutism is the belief that there are absolute standards where moral questions are judged and can be deemed right or wrong, regardless of the context. Steadfast laws of the universe, God, nature itself are the forces that deem an action right or wrong. A person’s actions rather than morals and motivations are important in an Absolutism

Different moral theories have their own insights and criticisms. Applying different moral theories to government’s policy-making is important because it may provide guidance for government in implementing a “right” policy. In my opinion, I believe that moral pluralism provides the best guidance for government’s policy-making. This essay will examine the reasons why moral pluralism provides the best guidance for the government while the other three moral theories could not. By definition, moral pluralism

Consequentialist moral theory is a branch of ethics which is centered around morality being the result of an outcome of a certain action. The consequence of an action is the premise which defines what is moral and what is immoral. The morality is found in two areas of goods, instrumental goods and intrinsic goods. Instrumental goods are goods that allow us to acquire other goods. Intrinsic goods are goods that have some form of worth in which we desire, but may not lead us to receiving or obtaining

This short paper will discuss Moral Foundation Theory in relation to the Germanpeople’s initial support and eventual disgust at the “Final Solution” pre and post World War II. Iposit that The Nazi party appealed to the German people using arguments of purity, fairness,authority, and loyalty. This rendered them to feel morally justified in their support of the “FinalSolution” which was the Nazi party’s policy of eugenics and genocide towards the Jews andother undesirables like homosexuals, mentally