NASA

money to building a space-station on either the moon or mars. This topic, is a rather tricky one. It's somewhat hard because it would definitely take a very long time, and it would take a lot of recourses. It would also be slightly hard for, let’s say NASA ( National Aeronautics and Space Administration ) to send more and more resources every time the newly colonized planet may need. They would definitely need some pretty high tech to ship stuff to us. So let's just jump into it. So, for the time

Yes, NASA should focus more on unmanned space missions, the benefits of sending a robot, satellite, or probe to outer space are far more beneficial and safer, than to send a human. It's dangerous to send a human into the vast unknown, without first surveying the surroundings of that planet or region of space. This is where satellites, and rovers are extremely valuable because it can not only take pictures, but it can also explore and take in information without the threat of losing a life. Robotic

NASA should reignite the space race for many reasons. NASA has too much money and does not spend it on helpful space research. American civilians want to know what is out there in the universe. Also, NASA needs to spend money on new space suits and equipment for multiple reasons. NASA should reignite the space race because, it gives them something to spend their money on, it's about time they up their space research, and the idea excites eager Americans. First, reigniting the space race would give

unless it is pointed out. That little speck is our planet.Government spending on NASA has helped to achieve this and it allows us to see things about our universe that we would have never have had been able to see before. NASA funding can be beneficial because it shows us things about our universe that we have never known and things we would have never thought to explore.This is what NASA is trying to accomplish. However NASA funding can be detrimental because it costs more and more each year and it pushes

history with amazing moments such as when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon.  The cost of NASA has also eaten up funds from other programs. Building a spaceship and rocket is a long process, and some question if it is worth the time. When the NASA program reaches its goal of landing on Mars, all of science will benefit from the mission. In order to advance science,Although it is slow and expensive, should NASA be given more money in order to advance science?     The space program is not built for

To the Moon and Back: Why NASA Should Receive More Funding Once upon a time in the not so distant past there was no such thing as a thermometer you put in your ear. Instead, to take your temperature you were to sit in the doctor’s office waiting, and waiting, and waiting… still waiting. Then your name would be called and you would walk into the office just in time to drop your trousers and have a rectal examination to take your temperature. Now, if you’re like me, you would probably much rather

Many discoveries are still to be made in space and NASA has many new projects. They are designing technology to send people to Mars or even asteroids. Therefor, a lot of money is being spent on these projects. NASA is also developing new robots to launch up into space. However, the technological advances will further our knowledge in the space world. Many scientist has influenced today's world. A example for that is in the medical field. People are currently working on methods to treat alzheimer's

From improving the camera, predicting the weather, all the way to getting man to the moon. Nasa has accomplished great things and helped our everyday lives. Without NASA, life here on earth would be significantly different. It helps develop newer technologies that improve lifestyle and safety. The research and development of these technologies take a lot of money. The increase of NASA funding would help speed up and improve the development of these technologies that would save lives and make it more

Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) “receives just 0.4 percent of the $4.407 trillion FY 2019 federal budget. Compare that to the Department of Defense. Its budget is $597 billion, or 13 percent of the total” (thebalance source). NASA could do so much with an increased budget. With an increased budget, the date for a manned mission to Mars would be greatly reduced. The human race could be multi-planetary before the year 2025 with an increase in budget for NASA. NASA has so many projects that it cannot

The funding for NASA in comparison to other forms of discretionary spending by the government, shows an unfair distribution of money by miscalculating the worth of the space industry. In the past, NASA has proven its resourcefulness to the people by transferring a multitude of space technology and services to commercial use. By the year 2018, NASA will obtain a budget of $19.7 billion U.S. dollars (Office of Management and Budget), an amount that underestimates the value of NASA to the U.S. Studies